2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12964-015-0106-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus-dependent differences in signalling regulate epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity and change the effects of drugs in breast cancer cell lines

Abstract: Introduction: The normal process of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) is subverted by carcinoma cells to facilitate metastatic spread. Cancer cells rarely undergo a full conversion to the mesenchymal phenotype, and instead adopt positions along the epithelial-mesenchymal axis, a propensity we refer to as epithelial mesenchymal plasticity (EMP). EMP is associated with increased risk of metastasis in breast cancer and consequent poor prognosis. Drivers towards the mesenchymal state in malignant cells inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
5
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A SOX10-low state is associated with reduced cell proliferation and engagement of EMT-like processes in melanoma to promote more invasive phenotypes [55] - a state maintained, in part, through mutual-antagonism with the closely related transcription factor SOX9 [56]. SOX10 suppression contributes to BRAF- and/or MEK-inhibitor resistance in BRAF mutated melanoma, by activating TGFβ signalling to upregulate EGFR and PDGFRB [57], whilst increasing SOX9 transcript abundance has been observed in breast cancer EMT [58]. SOX9-high LM-MEL cell lines are also enriched for an invasive phenotype (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SOX10-low state is associated with reduced cell proliferation and engagement of EMT-like processes in melanoma to promote more invasive phenotypes [55] - a state maintained, in part, through mutual-antagonism with the closely related transcription factor SOX9 [56]. SOX10 suppression contributes to BRAF- and/or MEK-inhibitor resistance in BRAF mutated melanoma, by activating TGFβ signalling to upregulate EGFR and PDGFRB [57], whilst increasing SOX9 transcript abundance has been observed in breast cancer EMT [58]. SOX9-high LM-MEL cell lines are also enriched for an invasive phenotype (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is a widely used model for the study of EMT in breast cancer (Bonnomet et al, 2012;Cursons et al, 2015;Davis et al, 2014;Lo et al, 2007). The MDA-MB-468 cell line expresses high levels of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and is responsive to EMT induction by EGF, a growth factor present in the tumor microenvironment and associated with tumor progression (Goswami et al, 2005).…”
Section: Epidermal Growth Factor (Egf)-induced Emt In Basal-like Mda-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MDA-MB-468 cell line expresses high levels of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and is responsive to EMT induction by EGF, a growth factor present in the tumor microenvironment and associated with tumor progression (Goswami et al, 2005). Various regulators of the EMT phenotype have been identified in MDA-MB-468 cells, including cell surface receptors (Lester et al, 2007) and components of intracellular signaling pathways (Cursons et al, 2015;Jo et al, 2009;Lo et al, 2007). Recently, the calcium permeable ion channel TRPM7 was identified as a regulator of the induction of the intermediate filament protein vimentin, a well-characterized mesenchymal marker, in the MDA-MB-468 model of EGF-induced EMT (Davis et al, 2014).…”
Section: Epidermal Growth Factor (Egf)-induced Emt In Basal-like Mda-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypoxic microenvironments may promote adaptive survival programs, which are often associated with resistance to apoptosis, angiogenesis and migration (Ruan et al., 2009). Recent studies show that hypoxia induces EMT in a variety of cancer cell types (Cannito et al., 2008; Cooke et al., 2012; Misra et al., 2012; Sahlgren et al., 2008; Salnikov et al., 2012; Shaikh et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013), including the MDA‐MB‐468 cell line used in our study (Cursons et al., 2015; Jo et al., 2009; Lundgren et al., 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%