2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulation of the right entorhinal white matter enhances visual memory encoding in humans

Abstract: Background: While deep brain stimulation has been successful in treating movement disorders, such as in Parkinson's disease, its potential application in alleviating memory disorders is inconclusive. Objective/Hypothesis: We investigated the role of the location of the stimulating electrode on memory improvement and hypothesized that entorhinal white versus gray matter stimulation would have differential effects on memory. Methods: Intracranial electrical stimulation was applied to the entorhinal area of twent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We could not offer a full accounting for why some stimulation targets yielded dramatic increases in theta power, while others appear to cause no discernible change in brain activity and yet others caused theta power decreases. Anecdotal evidence from single subjects suggests the proximity of stimulation to white matter may play a role, which intuitively aligns with expectations regarding the propagation of signals through the brain and recent behavioral evidence [47]. However, our population did not show a significant effect of white matter proximity e or functional connectedness e indicating that other factors dictate the efficaciousness of a stimulation site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We could not offer a full accounting for why some stimulation targets yielded dramatic increases in theta power, while others appear to cause no discernible change in brain activity and yet others caused theta power decreases. Anecdotal evidence from single subjects suggests the proximity of stimulation to white matter may play a role, which intuitively aligns with expectations regarding the propagation of signals through the brain and recent behavioral evidence [47]. However, our population did not show a significant effect of white matter proximity e or functional connectedness e indicating that other factors dictate the efficaciousness of a stimulation site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We could not offer a full accounting for why some stimulation targets yielded dramatic increases in theta power, while others appear to cause no discernible change in brain activity and yet others caused theta power decreases. Anecdotal evidence from single subjects suggests the proximity of stimulation to white matter may play a role, which intuitively aligns with expectations regarding the propagation of signals through the brain and recent behavioral evidence 37 . However, our population did not show a signi cant effect of white matter proximity -or functional connectedness -indicating that other factors dictate the e caciousness of a stimulation site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This choice was made to limit the scope to a purely distance measure. While there are exciting conclusions to be made relative to white matter tractography, connectivity, and stimulation [30,61,103], this data set did not have J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 45 consistent enough sampling of noninvasive scans mapping white matter (such as diffusion tensor imaging, or DTI). Further, both our approach and a companion study by Parmigiani et al [83] was to start from a naïve geometrically-focused perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Trains of stimulation in grey matter were shown to be more effective at decreasing high frequency activity as opposed to stimulation in white matter, with stronger effects in the neocortex versus the medial temporal lobe [29]. Interestingly, though, white matter stimulation with trains (as opposed to grey matter stimulation) in the mesial temporal lobe can improve visual memory encoding [103]. Therefore, further work is needed to resolve the differences between low frequency voltage responses such as CCEP, high frequency responses (trains), and stimulation location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%