1996
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.16.1.270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulation of Proliferation of a Human Osteosarcoma Cell Line by Exogenous Acidic Fibroblast Growth Factor Requires both Activation of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and Growth Factor Internalization

Abstract: U2OSDr1 cells, originating from a human osteosarcoma, are resistant to the intracellular action of diphtheria toxin but contain toxin receptors on their surfaces. These cells do not have detectable amounts of fibroblast growth factor receptors. When these cells were transfected with fibroblast growth factor receptor 4, the addition of acidic fibroblast growth factor to the medium induced tyrosine phosphorylation, DNA synthesis, and cell proliferation. A considerable fraction of the cell-associated growth facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
103
2
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(100 reference statements)
6
103
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It thus follows that FGF-3 and FGF-4 expressed in the same cell type and from identical constructs, have distinct modes of action and confer to the EF43 cells an invasive, tumorigenic and metastatic phenotype via signaling pathways that lead to transcriptional activation of distinct genes. Because translocation within the cell has been demonstrated for FGF-1 and 2 (Wiedlocha et al, 1996), an FGF intracellular signal cannot be excluded as a possible mechanism of action. However, FGF-4 transforms cells through an autocrine loop that involves the extracellular activation of the receptors (Talarico and Basilico, 1991).…”
Section: In Vitro Invasive Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It thus follows that FGF-3 and FGF-4 expressed in the same cell type and from identical constructs, have distinct modes of action and confer to the EF43 cells an invasive, tumorigenic and metastatic phenotype via signaling pathways that lead to transcriptional activation of distinct genes. Because translocation within the cell has been demonstrated for FGF-1 and 2 (Wiedlocha et al, 1996), an FGF intracellular signal cannot be excluded as a possible mechanism of action. However, FGF-4 transforms cells through an autocrine loop that involves the extracellular activation of the receptors (Talarico and Basilico, 1991).…”
Section: In Vitro Invasive Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check that the mutated aFGF had retained its ability to bind to FGF receptors, we added the labeled growth factor to different cell lines and kept them on ice for 2 h, then the cells were washed and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. In the absence of heparin, wild-type growth factor bound extensively to untransfected U2OSDR1 cells as well as to the same cells transfected with FGF receptor 4 (U2OSDR1-R4) (12) and to NIH 3T3 cells expressing FGF receptor 1 (22) (Fig. 1A, lanes 1, 4, and 7), while aFGF(K132E) bound to a lesser extent under the same conditions (lanes 10 and 16).…”
Section: Afgf(k132e) Binds To and Activates Fgf Receptors Butmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aFGF(K132E) Is Translocated to the Nuclear FractionThere are several reports that externally added aFGF is translocated to the nuclear fraction in cells containing FGF receptors (4,5,12,23,24). This transport appears to be required for stimulation of DNA synthesis, at least in certain cells (3,4,12).…”
Section: Afgf(k132e) Binds To and Activates Fgf Receptors Butmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the nuclear CUG-initiated forms are involved in cell proliferation by a cell-surface receptorindependent pathway [13]. Concurrently with bFGF, the intracellular route has been recently analysed for acidic FGF [15,16], and the results strongly suggest two distinct but complementary endogenous and exogenous pathways [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%