Stimulation of mammalian translation initiation factor eIF4A activity by a small molecule inhibitor of eukaryotic translation

Abstract

RNA helicases are the largest group of enzymes in eukaryotic RNA metabolism. The DEXD͞H-box putative RNA helicases form the helicase superfamily II, whose members are defined by seven highly conserved amino acid motifs, making specific targeting of selected members a challenging pharmacological problem. The translation initiation factor eIF4A is the prototypical DEAD-box RNA helicase that works in conjunction with eIF4B and eIF4H and as a subunit of eIF4F to prepare the mRNA template for ribosome binding, possibly by unwinding the secondary structure proximal to the 5 m 7 GpppN cap structure. We report the identification and characterization of a small molecule inhibitor of eukaryotic translation initiation that acts in an unusual manner by stimulating eIF4A-associated activities. Our results suggest that proper control of eIF4A helicase activity is necessary for efficient ribosome binding and demonstrate the feasibility of selectively targeting DEADbox RNA helicases with small molecules.chemical biology ͉ DEAD-box helicase ͉ pateamine T he ribosome recruitment step of translation initiation is ratelimiting and an important regulatory point whereby cellular environmental cues (e.g., amino acid starvation, mitogenic stimulation, and hypoxia) are linked to the process of translation (1). Two distinct pathways exist for recruitment of the ribosome to the mRNA template. One mechanism is cap-dependent and is facilitated by the presence of the 5Ј cap structure (m 7 GpppN, where N is any nucleotide) on the mRNA. It is catalyzed by the eIF4 class of translation initiation factors and involves the recruitment of ribosomes near the 5Ј end of the mRNA template (1). The second mode involves ribosome recruitment in a cap-independent fashion to an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). Initiation factor requirement for internal ribosome binding varies among IRESes, with some not requiring any factors (2).Preparation of the mRNA template for cap-dependent ribosome recruitment is achieved by eIF4F, eIF4A, eIF4B, eIF4H, and ATP hydrolysis (1). The eIF4F complex is comprised of three subunits: (i) eIF4E, which binds the mRNA cap structure in an ATP-independent fashion; (ii) eIF4A, an RNA helicase that exhibits RNA-dependent ATPase activity and ATPstimulated RNA binding activity (3); and (iii) eIF4G, a modular scaffold that mediates mRNA binding of the 43S preinitiation complex through interactions with eIF3. eIF4B, and eIF4H cooperate with eIF4A to make its helicase activity more processive (4, 5). eIF4A exists as a free form (referred to herein as eIF4A f ) and as a subunit of eIF4F (eIF4A c ) and is thought to cycle through the eIF4F complex during initiation (6-8). When localized in the eIF4F complex, eIF4A c is Ϸ20-fold more efficient as an RNA helicase than when found alone (4, 9), leading to the proposal that eIF4A c is the functional helicase for translation initiation (10). The helicase activity of eIF4F (via eIF4A c ) is thought to unwind local secondary structure in the 5Ј UTR of mRNAs to facilitate cap-dependent ribosome...

Caliciviruses Differ in Their Functional Requirements for eIF4F Components

“…Hippuristanol (25), as well as pateamine (43,44) both affect eIF4A function, although through different mechanisms. Pateamine affects eIF4A function by deregulating the ATPase and helicase activities, stimulating both (43,44).…”

“…Pateamine affects eIF4A function by deregulating the ATPase and helicase activities, stimulating both (43,44). Hippuristanol blocks eIF4A-dependent translation by inhibiting its RNA binding, ATPase, and helicase activities via interactions with the C-terminal domain of eIF4A (25).…”

Stable Formation of Compositionally Unique Stress Granules in Virus-Infected Cells

“…For example, in heat-shocked cells the canonical translation initiation factor eIF4G is bound by Hsp27 and recruited to SGs, thus inactivating the cap binding complex, eIF4F, and inhibiting translation initiation (9). More recently hippuristanol and pateamine A, two compounds that inhibit translation initiation via interaction with eIF4A, another eIF4F component, were found to promote the formation of SGs (5,6,27,29). Notably, SG formation by pateamine A does not require phosphorylation of eIF2␣ (10,29).…”

A novel mechanism for Bcr-Abl action: Bcr-Abl-mediated induction of the eIF4F translation initiation complex and mRNA translation

“…This model provides a better understanding of the mechanisms mediating the activity of imatinib and rapamycin in CML, and suggests several rational and novel points for therapeutic intervention in CML, including agents that interfere with the process of cap-dependent translation (Kentsis et al, 2004;Bordeleau et al, 2005;Low et al, 2005).…”