2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stillbirth rates across three ape species in accredited American zoos

Abstract: Stillbirths, or births of infants that died in the womb, represent a failure of the materno-feto-placental unit to maintain a suitable fetal environment. Typical studies of nonhuman primate (NHP) stillbirth patterns are primarily descriptive and focus on macaques (genus Macaca). Thus, less is known about other NHP species and rarer still are studies that examine possible biological factors that influence stillbirth rates across taxa. To examine possible contributors to stillbirths in great apes, we analyzed 36… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stillbirth rate can also be calculated by referencing data from the chimpanzee studbook [ 63 ], which reports the total number of birth events during the study period (n = 147). Here, the stillbirth rate was 14.2%, which is very similar to the rate published over a slightly different timeframe (12%, [ 74 ]) and approximately equivalent to the rates demonstrated by other species of zoo-living great ape. Though some may question the welfare implications for stillborn infants, it is noted that for humans, the stillbirth prevalence has the potential for increased maternal morbidity risks and complications that may impact health and welfare [ 75 , 76 ], and similar risks for chimpanzees would be expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The stillbirth rate can also be calculated by referencing data from the chimpanzee studbook [ 63 ], which reports the total number of birth events during the study period (n = 147). Here, the stillbirth rate was 14.2%, which is very similar to the rate published over a slightly different timeframe (12%, [ 74 ]) and approximately equivalent to the rates demonstrated by other species of zoo-living great ape. Though some may question the welfare implications for stillborn infants, it is noted that for humans, the stillbirth prevalence has the potential for increased maternal morbidity risks and complications that may impact health and welfare [ 75 , 76 ], and similar risks for chimpanzees would be expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While these comparisons are worthwhile, we must acknowledge that survivorship comparisons are complicated because of the difficulty in assessing early life mortality for wild chimpanzees, including stillbirths. We removed stillbirths from these analyses, but it is impossible to say how stillbirth rates in captive settings, documented at 12% for AZA (Saiyed et al, 2018) and 15% for Japan (Havercamp et al, 2019), compare to those experienced by wild-living chimpanzees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost one in six chimpanzees in Japan are stillborn. Of 391 chimpanzees born from 1980 to 2016 in North American AZA-accredited zoos, 48 (12%) were stillborn (Saiyed et al 2018). During the same time period, 63 of 415 (15%) infants in Japan were stillborn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studbook and other historical databases are excellent resources for the study of animal biology, care and management (Fisken et al 2018). Studbook data from accredited American zoos have previously been used to investigate chimpanzee birth timing (Wagner and Ross 2008) and great ape stillbirth rates (Saiyed et al 2018), and from European zoos to understand chimpanzee geographic origins and admixture (Hvilsom et al 2013). Few other databases exist such as AnAge (de Magalhães and Costa 2009), PanTHE-RIA (Jones et al 2009) and All The World's Primates (Rowe and Myers 2017), but captive data are still most commonly maintained in difficult-to-access national or regional studbooks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%