2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Still want to help? Interpersonal coordination's effects on helping behaviour after a 24 hour delay

Abstract: A fast-growing literature is establishing how moving in time together has pro-social consequences, though no work to date has explored the transience of these effects.Across two studies, people who had previously performed coordinated movements were over three times more likely to give their time to help their co-actor when asked 24 hours later than those who had performed an uncoordinated version of the task.Findings showed group-level categorization, but not social affiliation partially mediated helping beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the notion that coordinated movement may lead to greater prosociality as mediated by deindividuation levels, it has been reported that two experiments showing that synchrony not only increases the odds that a participant will be willing to help others, but that their likelihood of helping is directly related to their reported levels of deindividuation [14]. That is, the greater the level of deindividuation evoked by synchronous movement, the more likely participants are to offer help.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with the notion that coordinated movement may lead to greater prosociality as mediated by deindividuation levels, it has been reported that two experiments showing that synchrony not only increases the odds that a participant will be willing to help others, but that their likelihood of helping is directly related to their reported levels of deindividuation [14]. That is, the greater the level of deindividuation evoked by synchronous movement, the more likely participants are to offer help.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…An example of this is that synchronous walking, or cup waving and singing, results in participants making more cooperative choices in subsequent economic games, even if such choices come at a real financial cost to them [13]. Other research has shown that after moving synchronously together, participants are more likely to help their co-actors, even some time after the initial coordination task [14], as well as to conform and obey their requests [15,16], and show better memories for co-actors [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross et al (2017) also showed that imagining coordinating leads individuals to view themselves in more interdependent, or group level terms, rather than individual terms. Finally Cross et al (2020) showed that changes in viewing oneself and ones co-actor in individual versus common group terms mediated coordination's effect on helping behaviour. Thus, it appears that coordination's social effects are particularly tied to group dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One possible means of reducing negative stereotypes may be to have people engage in coordinated movement with individuals from disenfranchised groups, such as walking in synchrony with them. This is supported by behavioural studies which show that interpersonal coordination can to lead to greater pro-sociality amongst co-actors by increasing rapport (Hove & Risen, 2009), affiliation (Reddish, Fischer, & Bulbulia, 2013), cooperation (Cross, Wilson, & Golonka, 2016) and helping (Cross, Micheal, Wilsdon, Henson, & Atherton, 2020) amongst those who take part. Even imagining coordinating has been shown to lead to some of the same social consequences as actually coordinating (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…All of this work has relied on explicit self-report measures of similarity, closeness and connectedness between co-actors or pictorial ratings of overlap using the Inclusion of Other in Self scale (IoS) 24 . Similarly, there is also some evidence that seeing oneself and one's partner less as an individual and more as a member of a group may mediate the relationship between synchrony and pro-sociality 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%