2017
DOI: 10.3390/soc7040029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Still Troubled: Tunisia’s Youth During and Since the Revolution of 2011

Abstract: This paper presents evidence from interviews in 2015-2016 with a nationally representative sample of Tunisia's 15-29 year olds. We focus on the sample's political participation and orientations during the revolution of 2011 and subsequently. We find that just 6.6 percent of those aged 15-24 at the time played any direct part in the 'events of 2011'. Political engagement then and subsequently is shown to have been influenced most strongly by a university education and growing up in a politically engaged family.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This became evident during the 2014 elections that had Caid Essebsi elected as the first democratic president of Tunisia in 2014. Voter turnout was very low, especially amongst the youth, who by then had become ambivalent and not very confident of the changes that they had fought for (Roberts, Kovacheva and Kabaivonov 2017).…”
Section: Youth Democracy and The Post-arab Spring Transition In Tunisiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This became evident during the 2014 elections that had Caid Essebsi elected as the first democratic president of Tunisia in 2014. Voter turnout was very low, especially amongst the youth, who by then had become ambivalent and not very confident of the changes that they had fought for (Roberts, Kovacheva and Kabaivonov 2017).…”
Section: Youth Democracy and The Post-arab Spring Transition In Tunisiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specific participation of young people in associations that emerged from 2011 is not very well known either. The few data available that come from various surveys (Abbott, Andrea, and Sapsford 2018;Gertel and Hexel 2018;Roberts, Siyka, and Kabaivanov 2017), indicate that the level of participation of young people in associations varies greatly depending on how it is defined and presented in the surveys and how the interviewees understand it. These different definitions and representations mean that it oscillates between a commitment from a very small percentage of young people when asked about activism, affiliation, or belonging to an organisation (between 2.9% and 13%), and a fairly extended collaboration when they are asked about their specific contribution in certain activities of the associations (30%) or their proximity to them (28%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young people seem to prefer more informal or unconventional forms of civic and political participation that best suit their interests and needs. Their participation is generally divorced from any political affiliation and from the electoral politics of the formal democratic system, though it may still be political [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Given this new portrait which is emerging, civic participation is now more broadly defined, overcoming the barriers of the formal political space in a way which includes engagement in volunteering, social movements and local organizations [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%