Still Sexist: The Relationship Between Sexism and Applicant Evaluations

Salvaggio, Amy Nicole; Streich, Michelle; Fitzke, Jenna R.; Denney, Rebecca A.

doi:10.1037/e518572013-376

PsycEXTRA Dataset 2006

DOI: 10.1037/e518572013-376

|View full text |Cite

Still Sexist: The Relationship Between Sexism and Applicant Evaluations

Amy Nicole Salvaggio¹,

Michelle Streich²,

Jenna R. Fitzke³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2006

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several papers at SIOP refute this belief. For example, Amy Salvaggio and her colleagues (Salvaggio et al , 2006) considered evaluations of female and male job applicants and found that individuals who endorsed items related to sexist attitudes tended to evaluate female applicants more negatively than their male counterparts. The authors concluded that individual differences in attitudes toward women lead to a workplace that is “still sexist”.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Report from SIOP

King

2006

Equal Opportunities International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe current report is intended to provide a narrow, brief summery of research presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology regarding women in organizations.Design/methodology/approachThe conference, which broadly seeks to inform the science and practice of human well‐being and performance in organizations and draws thousands of participants from academic, consulting, and government agencies, included over 35 symposia, posters, and meetings related to diversity in organizations.FindingsResearch presented provided empirical evidence that women continue to face subtle forms of discrimination and that there are consequences for such women and their employing organizations.Research limitations/implicationsMore multidisciplinary theory and research is needed to identify and develop effective strategies for the reduction of gender discrimination and the achievement of equal opportunities for men and women.Originality/valueIn summary, the SIOP conference continues serves as an incubator for research and practice regarding diversity in organizations. In particular, this year's meeting contributors provided empirical evidence that subtle discrimination toward women in organizations persists and that perceptions of bias can lead to negative attitudes and behaviors.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Report from SIOP

King

2006

Equal Opportunities International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Still Sexist: The Relationship Between Sexism and Applicant Evaluations

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Report from SIOP

Report from SIOP

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About