Abstract:While media images can ease political information perception and processing, the impact of images on behavioral intentions to engage in protest is relatively unexplored. We ask: Under what conditions can news images of protest “move” people and affect the willingness to participate? Aiming to answer this question from an information-processing perspective, we shed light on the nexus between spontaneous, sensory behavior and cognition in response to news media images of protest. We conducted a multigroup experi… Show more
“…Answering RQ2, the images were mostly negative, capturing users' attention (Kleinnijenhuis, 2008), and likely to elicit emotions associated with collective action, such as anger (Cohen-Chen & Van Zomeren, 2018;Stürmer & Simon, 2009;Tausch et al, 2011) but also fear and optimism. Prior work has shown that negative (but not positive) images can increase (normative) collective action intention (Geise et al, 2021), while Winter (2018) argues that documenting the victimization and suffering of the ingroup makes the promise of the extremists' utopian vision even more powerful.…”
Section: Main Findings and Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both valence and distinct emotions influence collective action. Research on collective action has shown that negative images are not only more attention grabbing but also increase willingness for collective action (Geise et al, 2021). The social identity model of collective action (van Zomeren et al, 2008) postulates that collective action, in general, has three main drivers: First, people must identify with their respective ingroup.…”
Social media platforms, such as Instagram, are regularly misused for spreading covert (Islamic) extremist propaganda. Affect and emotion are central tools used in extremist propaganda, but there is little research into the combined employment of different social media elements, such as hashtags, visuals, and texts, in the context of propaganda. This study contributes to closing this gap. Using the German group Generation Islam as a case study, we examined the group’s Instagram activity ( N = 1,187 posts) over the course of 2 years. To reflect the platform users’ logic, we (a) examined affect in hashtag networks in which users can come across propagandistic content, (b) employed deep learning to examine the emotional valence transmitted in the visuals, and (c) used automated linguistic analysis to describe collective action cues contained within the texts. The results are novel, as they provide nuanced insights into extremist propaganda’s employment of affect and emotions across Instagram’s affordances.
“…Answering RQ2, the images were mostly negative, capturing users' attention (Kleinnijenhuis, 2008), and likely to elicit emotions associated with collective action, such as anger (Cohen-Chen & Van Zomeren, 2018;Stürmer & Simon, 2009;Tausch et al, 2011) but also fear and optimism. Prior work has shown that negative (but not positive) images can increase (normative) collective action intention (Geise et al, 2021), while Winter (2018) argues that documenting the victimization and suffering of the ingroup makes the promise of the extremists' utopian vision even more powerful.…”
Section: Main Findings and Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both valence and distinct emotions influence collective action. Research on collective action has shown that negative images are not only more attention grabbing but also increase willingness for collective action (Geise et al, 2021). The social identity model of collective action (van Zomeren et al, 2008) postulates that collective action, in general, has three main drivers: First, people must identify with their respective ingroup.…”
Social media platforms, such as Instagram, are regularly misused for spreading covert (Islamic) extremist propaganda. Affect and emotion are central tools used in extremist propaganda, but there is little research into the combined employment of different social media elements, such as hashtags, visuals, and texts, in the context of propaganda. This study contributes to closing this gap. Using the German group Generation Islam as a case study, we examined the group’s Instagram activity ( N = 1,187 posts) over the course of 2 years. To reflect the platform users’ logic, we (a) examined affect in hashtag networks in which users can come across propagandistic content, (b) employed deep learning to examine the emotional valence transmitted in the visuals, and (c) used automated linguistic analysis to describe collective action cues contained within the texts. The results are novel, as they provide nuanced insights into extremist propaganda’s employment of affect and emotions across Instagram’s affordances.
“…This study extends from scholars across social sciences and humanities who have analyzed Thunberg’s speeches and writings (García 2020; Skilbeck 2020); analyzed social media posts that contain hashtags and keywords relevant to the climate movement (Boulianne et al 2020; Han and Ahn 2020; Jung et al 2020); and examined how mainstream media frames Thunberg’s message and actions (Ryalls and Mazzarella 2021; von Zabern and Tulloch 2021). Visual information has been shown to help people better process and remember information (Graber 1996), and, in the realm of social movements, motivate viewers toward engagement in protests (Geise et al 2021). While this study does not analyze the intentions behind Thunberg’s posts nor the linkages between communication and engagement, it contributes to this research on Thunberg as a globally influential communicator by attending to her own framing and powerful use of visual communication.…”
Climate change is a critical global problem that requires immediate action to mitigate its effects. In recent years, youth climate activists have mobilized worldwide protests to demand action, using social media platforms to communicate and broadcast their message. This study examines Greta Thunberg's rise to global prominence through an analysis of her first year and a half of Instagram posts from June 2018 to January 2020, including visual and textual elements. First, we explore how climate change is communicated on social media by youth activists, and then examine these concepts through the unique case of Thunberg’s Instagram. Then, through qualitative content analysis, this study elucidates her communication strategy by applying the concept of framing to unpack how she frames climate change as a moral and ethical issue, uses an emotional appeal of hope, and visually frames motivational collective action to mobilize her audience. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings to explore the complexities of communicating climate change through social media and how Thunberg's activism on Instagram may provide an example for future generations.
“…Más allá de que el uso de Twitter con fines políticos difiere enormemente por países (Scherpereel et al, 2016), la pandemia abre la puerta a un redescubrimiento de las potencialidades de las redes sociales, ampliamente abordadas como lugares de emisión y escasa interactividad (Geise et al, 2021). La Covid-19 ha acelerado los cambios en los patrones de consumo, de ahí que pueda haber espacio para aproximaciones más visuales y dinámicas de Twitter que entronquen con los mecanismos de transparencia demandados por la sociedad.…”
Section: Estrategias Y Comunicación Política En Twitterunclassified
Introducción: Las restricciones sociales impuestas por la pandemia de Covid-19 acentuaron el rol de las tecnologías como herramientas de interacción, pero también la función de las mismas en la comunicación institucional desarrollada por los gobiernos para explicar sus decisiones políticas ante una situación de crisis. Metodología: Esta investigación analiza comparativamente algunas de las estrategias comunicativas de los gobiernos de Alemania, España, Portugal y Reino Unido. Para ello se estudian los temas y objetivos de sus líderes o portavoces en Twitter: Steffen Seibert como representante de Merkel (Alemania), Pedro Sánchez (España), António Costa (Portugal) y Boris Johnson (Reino Unido). Asimismo, se analizan los mensajes en las webs oficiales de los gobiernos (Bundesregierung, La Moncloa, República Portuguesa y GOV.UK). Resultados: Se advierte una infrautilización de las potencialidades interactivas. Además, los temas y objetivos preferentes se repiten en Twitter y los portales institucionales, centrándose en el anuncio y evaluación de cuestiones sanitarias y económicas, si bien los mensajes en la red social abordan una mayor pluralidad de asuntos que no coindicen con los más retuiteados. Discusión: Las similitudes y divergencias halladas plantean una reflexión sobre el papel de las culturas políticas en la intervención comunicativa de los gobiernos, así como acerca de la necesidad de responder a los intereses de la audiencia. Conclusiones: La comunicación gubernamental se ha dirigido a las cuestiones más inmediatas de la pandemia, como la sanidad y la economía, desarrollando una agenda más amplia en Twitter que, en cambio, no se corresponde con los intereses observados entre el público.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.