2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-018-9608-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stigma Expression Outcomes and Boundary Conditions: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our results have implications for stigmatization theory (Crocker et al, 1998). We add to the dimensions or disability characteristics that affect the level of perceived stigma (Sabat et al, 2019). While Summer et al (2018) and Sabat and colleagues (2019) identified controllability and visibility, we show that the dimension severity and the need for workplace accommodations also must be taken into account when looking at disability stigmatization.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, our results have implications for stigmatization theory (Crocker et al, 1998). We add to the dimensions or disability characteristics that affect the level of perceived stigma (Sabat et al, 2019). While Summer et al (2018) and Sabat and colleagues (2019) identified controllability and visibility, we show that the dimension severity and the need for workplace accommodations also must be taken into account when looking at disability stigmatization.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, the visibility of impairments has been found to affect how individuals are viewed by others (Mik-Meyer, 2016) and increases the level of perceived stigmatization (Sabat et al, 2019). Second, it seems that controllability affects the extent to which one's condition is perceived to be stigmatizing (Sabat et al, 2019). Previous research found that individuals with disabilities that are perceived to be beyond their control were more positively perceived by others (Reilly, Bocketti, Maser & Wennet, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, we examine the extent to which different methods of racial acknowledgment are effective at reducing negative consequences (e.g., discrimination) and increasing positive consequences (e.g., easing interactions and getting one's point across) in interview contexts. This is of value because much of the current literature on identity management focuses on invisible identities (Clair, Beatty, & Maclean, 2005;King, Mohr, Peddie, Jones, & Kendra, 2017;Lidderdale, Croteau, & Anderson, 2007;Lynch & Rodell, 2018;Sabat et al, 2019). This is inarguably important research, yet individuals with visible identities are faced with different challenges (e.g., increased perceptions of discrimination due to prior discrimination; Davidson & Friedman, 1998), which may influence how they navigate identity management.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%