Abstract:Objectives. This study examines aspects of healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes about eating disorders (EDs), which might impede the effective detection or treatment of EDs in Ireland.Methods. A total of 1,916 healthcare professionals were invited to participate in a web-based survey. Participants were randomly allocated to view one of five vignettes depicting a young person with symptoms consistent with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, depression or type 1 diabetes. Study… Show more
“…This provides confidence that the research is not biased or unrepresentative. The validity of the results is also supported by their correspondence with previous similar research with adult samples (Griffiths et al, 2014b;McNicholas, O'Connor, O'Hara, & McNamara, 2015;Roehrig & McLean, 2010;Stewart et al, 2006Stewart et al, , 2008. Further research is necessary to discern the potential effects of participant characteristics (e.g., gender and personal eating or weight concerns), which would help tailor and target destigmatisation initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…One such factor is the name given to the vignette target. A similar study previously conducted with health professionals, which also asked participants to judge the gender of the vignette target, reported gender judgements that were more male-oriented than in the current study (McNicholas et al, 2015). The difference can be attributed to the previous study's use of the name 'Morgan', which in national naming conventions is more heavily skewed towards males than 'Alex' (Central Statistics Office, 2015).…”
Little research has investigated adolescents' understanding of eating disorders (EDs) or attitudes towards people affected by EDs. This impedes the development of targeted health promotion interventions. In the current study, 290 adolescents viewed a vignette depicting a target with either Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, Depression or Type 1 Diabetes. Subsequent questionnaires assessed understanding of and attitudes towards the disorder described. Adolescents recognised the symptoms of depression significantly more frequently than any ED. Relative to depression and Type 1 diabetes, participants held targets with EDs more personally responsible for their illness and ascribed them more negative personality characteristics. The data revealed a particularly unfavourable view of Binge Eating Disorder, which was conceptualised as a failure of self-discipline rather than a medical condition. The results confirm previous findings that EDs are more stigmatised than other mental or physical health conditions and extend the findings to an adolescent cohort.
“…This provides confidence that the research is not biased or unrepresentative. The validity of the results is also supported by their correspondence with previous similar research with adult samples (Griffiths et al, 2014b;McNicholas, O'Connor, O'Hara, & McNamara, 2015;Roehrig & McLean, 2010;Stewart et al, 2006Stewart et al, , 2008. Further research is necessary to discern the potential effects of participant characteristics (e.g., gender and personal eating or weight concerns), which would help tailor and target destigmatisation initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…One such factor is the name given to the vignette target. A similar study previously conducted with health professionals, which also asked participants to judge the gender of the vignette target, reported gender judgements that were more male-oriented than in the current study (McNicholas et al, 2015). The difference can be attributed to the previous study's use of the name 'Morgan', which in national naming conventions is more heavily skewed towards males than 'Alex' (Central Statistics Office, 2015).…”
Little research has investigated adolescents' understanding of eating disorders (EDs) or attitudes towards people affected by EDs. This impedes the development of targeted health promotion interventions. In the current study, 290 adolescents viewed a vignette depicting a target with either Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, Depression or Type 1 Diabetes. Subsequent questionnaires assessed understanding of and attitudes towards the disorder described. Adolescents recognised the symptoms of depression significantly more frequently than any ED. Relative to depression and Type 1 diabetes, participants held targets with EDs more personally responsible for their illness and ascribed them more negative personality characteristics. The data revealed a particularly unfavourable view of Binge Eating Disorder, which was conceptualised as a failure of self-discipline rather than a medical condition. The results confirm previous findings that EDs are more stigmatised than other mental or physical health conditions and extend the findings to an adolescent cohort.
“…Knowledge and stigma did not necessarily improve together. This is also evident in samples of professionals, who have higher levels of knowledge but may retain stigmatizing attitudes (McNicholas et al, ), highlighting that stigma and knowledge are distinct domains. Those wishing to plan stigma reduction interventions should bear this in mind.…”
Stigma is a problem for individuals with eating disorders (EDs), forming a barrier to disclosure and help-seeking. Interventions to reduce ED stigma may help remove these barriers; however, it is not known which strategies (e.g., explaining etiology to reduce blame, contact with a person with an ED, or educating about ED) are effective in reducing stigma and related outcomes. This review described effectiveness of intervention strategies, and identified gaps in the literature. A search of four databases was performed using the terms (eating disorder* OR bulimi* OR anorexi* OR binge-eating disorder) AND (stigma* OR stereotyp* OR beliefs OR negative attitudes) AND (program OR experiment OR intervention OR education), with additional texts sought through LISTSERVs. Two raters screened papers, extracted data, and assessed quality. Stigma reduction strategies and study characteristics were examined in critical narrative synthesis. Exploratory meta-analysis compared the effects of biological and sociocultural explanations of EDs on attitudinal stigma. Eighteen papers were eligible for narrative synthesis, with four also eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis. Biological explanations reduced stigma relative to other explanations, including sociocultural explanations in meta-analysis (g = .47, p < .001). Combined education and contact interventions improved stigma relative to control groups or over time. Most studies examined Anorexia Nervosa (AN) stigma and had mostly female, undergraduate participants. Despite apparent effectiveness, research should verify that biological explanations do not cause unintentional harm. Future research should evaluate in vivo contact, directly compare education and contact strategies, and aim to generalize findings across community populations.
“…There is a strong correlation between eating disorder training and comfort level in identifying and managing eating disorders [29] [30]. Increased knowledge and screening results in early detection and intervention by physicians [27][31] [32]. Yet, medical providers may still lack the training and confidence to intervene.…”
Section: Physiciansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, medical providers may still lack the training and confidence to intervene. To illustrate, McNicholas et al [27] discovered that only 14.9% of physician respondents felt confident in their ability to manage eating disorders. Similarly, Linville et al [32] found 78% of medical providers were unsure of how to treat eating disorders, 92% felt they missed a diagnosis, and 67% reported a need for continuing education.…”
Health professionals struggle in caring for individuals with eating disorders, especially in New Brunswick, Canada where there is no recognized eating disorder treatment center. Using a narrative approach, this study explored the perceptions and experiences of professionals from seven regulated health professions that are most commonly involved in eating disorder care-medicine, dentistry, nursing, social work, occupational therapy, dietetics, and psychology. The findings bring to light the complexities of eating disorder care and the process that professionals go through in seeing beyond the eating disorder to understanding the often subtle subtexts that impede eating disorder identification and treatment. Looking at eating disorder care from an interprofessional perspective provides unique insight into common needs and challenges of practitioners and may ultimately inform treatment and prevention initiatives.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.