2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0047404513000638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stigma and ideological constructions of the foreign: Facing HIV/AIDS in South Africa

Abstract: In this article I discuss language ideologies and stigma, exploring how a group of South Africans living with HIV confronted the perceived language of HIV and engaged with international aid to live “positive lives” amid stigma. Based on ethnographic fieldwork with a Zulu choir that functioned as an HIV support group and AIDS activist organization, I analyze talk about how others talked about HIV (metapragmatic discourse about HIV) to suggest a language-ideological component of stigma. I also explore how choir … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discursive structures or discourses refer to patterns of shared meaning which guide and shape people’s relationships and forms of meaning-making (Parker, 1999). For example, in our analysis, we refer to existing cultural ideologies related to living positively with HIV, the stigma-induced barriers to the accessibility of medical care and ART, and the stigma to reproductive health decision-making (Black, 2013; Phinney et al, 2014; Sayles et al, 2009). On the other hand, material structures or the extra-discursive refer to conditions of possibility that are historically specific and culturally contingent (Foucault, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discursive structures or discourses refer to patterns of shared meaning which guide and shape people’s relationships and forms of meaning-making (Parker, 1999). For example, in our analysis, we refer to existing cultural ideologies related to living positively with HIV, the stigma-induced barriers to the accessibility of medical care and ART, and the stigma to reproductive health decision-making (Black, 2013; Phinney et al, 2014; Sayles et al, 2009). On the other hand, material structures or the extra-discursive refer to conditions of possibility that are historically specific and culturally contingent (Foucault, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because , I will say, my husband, because we were about to get married, this was where he showed me whether he loved me or not, because when I disclosed to him, we separated because I am HIV positive .” Rachel's use of the English “disclose” and “HIV positive” corresponded with a widespread pattern I observed in which choir members often used English terms such as HIV, TB (tuberculosis), CD4 count (a measure of white blood cells) and ARVs even in isiZulu conversation. In my work I have found that the term “HIV” was opposed to a number of other terms in English and in isiZulu , some of which were overtly stigmatizing—for example, i‐slim, referring to the wasting away of the body, i‐Hi Vee, and ingculazi , literally translated as AIDS (Black ). At other times, research participants told me that to use the supposedly neutral term ingculazi felt dirty.…”
Section: Activism Rights and Responsibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As someone trained in linguistic anthropology, though, I was oriented toward future linguistic analysis to an extent that I felt that audio recording of this group conversation was indispensable. This allowed for the capture of significant data on the ways that this group of women, including Amahle, engaged in collaborative storytelling practices to narrate their experiences with HIV (see Black ). I found that these and other research participants relied heavily on stereotypical gender discourses—in particular, critical stances on heterosexual Zulu masculinity—to normalize stories that were in danger of not being told due to the threat of HIV stigma (cf.…”
Section: Stigma Disclosure and The Ethics Of “Anonymity”mentioning
confidence: 99%