2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stigma and cervical cancer prevention: A scoping review of the U.S. literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Societal, community, and individual factors are associated with differential uptake of cervical cancer screening services and affect the ability to follow up after an abnormal test result . Stigma related to human papillomavirus infection or inability to receive screening can prevent further follow-up care, which can result in more advanced-stage cancer diagnoses. Also, human papillomavirus vaccination is an effective primary prevention intervention, and efforts should focus on ensuring that all eligible populations are vaccinated …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Societal, community, and individual factors are associated with differential uptake of cervical cancer screening services and affect the ability to follow up after an abnormal test result . Stigma related to human papillomavirus infection or inability to receive screening can prevent further follow-up care, which can result in more advanced-stage cancer diagnoses. Also, human papillomavirus vaccination is an effective primary prevention intervention, and efforts should focus on ensuring that all eligible populations are vaccinated …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer remains a stigmatised disease in many countries. Poor survival due to limited cancer control programmes and infrastructure in low‐income countries has led to a high sense of ‘fatalism’ related to a cancer diagnosis 6 and several studies have shown the impact of cancer stigma on screening rates 7,8 and reluctance to visit a health provider 9 . In addition, specific cancers linked to preventable risk factors or behavioural causes such as smoking, drinking or sexual interaction are stigmatised as ‘deserved’ or ‘self‐induced’ resulting in feelings of guilt, shame or the social isolation of patients 10 .…”
Section: Low‐middle Income Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the expression of attitudes related to stigma is moderated by social influence—that is by the ability of individuals to affect one another’s thoughts, ideas, and behaviors [ 12 , 13 ]. In these ways, stigma may directly and indirectly contribute to vaccine and screening hesitancy [ 14 ]. For example, stigmas around sexual behavior and HPV infection [ 15 ] may contribute to vaccine and screening hesitancy by causing individuals to avoid engagement with providers [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social norms that provided motivation to receive HPV vaccination and screening served as positive facilitators. Gender and social norms were negative facilitators of stigma [ 14 ]. Understanding how these factors contribute to the acceptability and adoption of cervical cancer prevention strategies is critical to preventing cervical cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%