2003
DOI: 10.2514/2.3166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffness Scaling for Solid-Cloth Parachutes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should be noted that R m contains a threshold for each type of parachute below which t O =t f is approximately unity. This agrees with [12,23,27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This should be noted that R m contains a threshold for each type of parachute below which t O =t f is approximately unity. This agrees with [12,23,27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, a comparison between Tables 2 and 4 shows that to theoretically halve the initial velocity (from 100 to 50 m=s) results in an approximately quarter reduction of the opening shock. This may be compared to a correlation used to calculate the opening shock as given by [6,7,10,12,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As noted in the next section, the small-scale canopies used in the experiments had indices which were approximately three times that of full-scale canopies. However, canopy performance has been shown to be a weak function of the canopy stiffness especially during steady descent (Johari and Desabrais, 2003).…”
Section: Dimensionless Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%