2018
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffness Identification of High-Rise Buildings Based on Statistical Model-Updating Approach

Abstract: A system identification problem is investigated for high-rise buildings to identify the story stiffnesses of a shear-bending model (SB model). In the previously proposed stiffness identification method due to the present authors, the shear and bending stiffnesses of the SB model were identified by means of the subspace and inverse-mode methods. The lowest mode of horizontal displacements and floor rotation angles of the objective building was identified first by using measured data of both horizontal and rotat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve this problem, methods of estimating the health of building for all stories have been proposed using few acceleration sensor responses (e.g., Shinagawa and Mita, 2013;Suzuki and Mita, 2016;Shirzad-Ghaleroudkhani et al, 2017;Jabini et al, 2018). Moreover, Fujita and Takewaki (2018) proposed a method of estimating the responses of all stories based on nonsimultaneous observations of each floor by moving the measurement device. In such methods, the vibration mode response or participation functions of all the stories must be estimated in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, methods of estimating the health of building for all stories have been proposed using few acceleration sensor responses (e.g., Shinagawa and Mita, 2013;Suzuki and Mita, 2016;Shirzad-Ghaleroudkhani et al, 2017;Jabini et al, 2018). Moreover, Fujita and Takewaki (2018) proposed a method of estimating the responses of all stories based on nonsimultaneous observations of each floor by moving the measurement device. In such methods, the vibration mode response or participation functions of all the stories must be estimated in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations on identification of hysteretic restoring-force characteristics of structures have been conducted in the last four decades (Toussi and Yao, 1983;Cifuentes, 1984;Leontaritis and Billings, 1985;Masri et al, 1987Masri et al, , 1993Loh and Chung, 1993;Kitada, 1998Kitada, , 2000Kitada et al, 2000;Li et al, 2004a,b;Saadat et al, 2004;Zhang and Sato, 2006;Ikhouance and Rodellar, 2007;Tasbihgoo et al, 2007;Worden and Manson, 2010;Brewick et al, 2016;Pelliciari et al, 2018). Although these investigations are versatile, the problem of physical parameter system identification of 3D building structures with mass and/or stiffness eccentricity is a tough problem (e.g., Omrani et al, 2012;Nabeshima and Takewaki, 2017;Shintani et al, 2017Shintani et al, , 2019Fujita and Takewaki, 2018). Compared to the previous researches using neural networks (Saadat et al, 2004;Tasbihgoo et al, 2007;Brewick et al, 2016), wavelet transforms (Kitada, 1998(Kitada, , 2000Saadat et al, 2004), support vector regressions (Zhang and Sato, 2006), fast Bayesian bootstrap filter (Li et al, 2004b), multi-stage iterative approach (Li et al, 2004a), the present approach is suitable for vertical and horizontal framewise simultaneous identification of hysteretic restoring-force characteristics of structural frames with flexible floors within a small amount of computational load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a very limited number of researches on physical-parameter system identification of 3D building structures with eccentricity (for example Omrani et al, 2012;Nabeshima and Takewaki, 2017;Shintani et al, 2017;Fujita and Takewaki, 2018). The existence of many parameters to be identified in 3D building structures may be one reason for difficulty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%