Stiffness Feedback for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses Using Vibrotactile Stimulation

Abstract

The ability to distinguish object stiffness is a very important aspect in object handling, but completely lacking in current myoelectric prostheses. In human hands both tactile and proprioceptive sensory information are required for stiffness determination. Therefore, it was investigated whether it is possible to distinguish object stiffness with vibrotactile feedback of hand opening and grasping force. Three configurations consisting of an array of coin motors and a single miniature vibrotactile transducer were investigated. Ten healthy subjects and seven subjects with upper limb loss due to amputation or congenital defects performed virtual grasping tasks, in which they controlled hand opening and grasping force. They were asked to determine the stiffness of a grasped virtual object from four options. With hand opening feedback alone or in combination with grasping force feedback, correct stiffness determination was achieved in around 60% of the cases and significantly higher than the 25% achieved without feedback or grasping force feedback alone. Despite the equal performance results, the combination of hand opening and grasping force feedback was preferred by the subjects over the hand opening feedback alone. No differences between feedback configurations and between subjects with upper limb loss and healthy subjects were found.

Humans Can Integrate Augmented Reality Feedback in Their Sensorimotor Control of a Robotic Hand

“…This is in line with previous research, in which the task speed was reduced when the feedback was turned ON [29], [30]. Additionally, the typical (median) load phase duration found in this setup [see Fig.…”

Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses

“…Its main effect was a statistically highly significant decrease in the fraction of broken blocks implying improved sensorimotor control. Importantly, in contrast to some past paradigms [34] [35], performance speed was not reduced when the feedback was turned on implying that providing DESC feedback minimally taxes subjects' cognitive systems. In addition, to evaluate the manipulation performance of the subjects, we have introduced a new test of sensorimotor functions of the hand, i.e., the Virtual Eggs Test (VET).…”

Identify key grasping-related properties based on cutaneous electrotactile stimulation

“…Thus, the tactile feedback included pressure feedback and slipping feedback. In the following equation (3,4), G, µ were the gravity and friction factor of the objects. The subjects identified the F eco by these equation during the experiment.…”

“…and investigate how tactile feedback affects the grasping or manipulating performance [2]- [5]. For the closed-loop control of grasping force, some studies utilize scroll wheel of a mouse or hand's displacement as the system's input, rather than surface electromyography (sEMG) of forearm [4], [6]. Obviously, amputees, without hand, hardly utilize such closed-loop system to grasp or manipulate an object.…”