2014
DOI: 10.7736/kspe.2014.31.7.627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffness Evaluation of a Heavy-Duty Multi-Tasking Lathe for Large Size Crankshaft Using Random Excitation Test

Abstract: Machine tool vibration is well known for reducing machining accuracy. Because vibration response of a linear structure generally depends on its transfer function if the magnitude of excitation were kept constant, this study introduces a RET(Random Excitation Test) based on FRF method to evaluate stiffness of a prototype HDMTL(Heavy-Duty Multi-Tasking Lathe) for large crankshaft of marine engine. Firstly, two force loops of the lathe and corresponding structural loops were identified:1) workpiece-spindle-head s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the analysis value and the measured value of stiffness is the error caused by simplifying the coupling of various parts, such as the feed guide surface and ball screw. Kang et al [ 11 ] analyzed and compared the structural stiffness and dynamics of machine tools using the impact test and excitation test methods. In addition, the accuracy of the natural frequency analysis and the static and dynamic stiffness evaluation methods were verified.…”
Section: Dynamic Characteristics Of Machining Centermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the analysis value and the measured value of stiffness is the error caused by simplifying the coupling of various parts, such as the feed guide surface and ball screw. Kang et al [ 11 ] analyzed and compared the structural stiffness and dynamics of machine tools using the impact test and excitation test methods. In addition, the accuracy of the natural frequency analysis and the static and dynamic stiffness evaluation methods were verified.…”
Section: Dynamic Characteristics Of Machining Centermentioning
confidence: 99%