1995
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffening Effects of Cortical Bone on Vertebral Cancellous Bone In Situ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with Bryce et al [3] who demonstrated with mechanical testing that the stiffening effect of the cortical shell increased as the isolated stiffness of the cancellous bone decreased. For the vertebral-shaped specimens, the combined effect of the shell thickness and the strut spacing was not found.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are in agreement with Bryce et al [3] who demonstrated with mechanical testing that the stiffening effect of the cortical shell increased as the isolated stiffness of the cancellous bone decreased. For the vertebral-shaped specimens, the combined effect of the shell thickness and the strut spacing was not found.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The presence of an outer wall (cortical shell) constrains the inner structured material (trabecular bone) limiting its lateral expansion; and therefore, the outer wall significantly affects the apparent elastic modulus of the specimen. These results are in agreement with Bryce et al [3] who demonstrated with biomechanical testing that the combined structure of cortical and cancellous bone in the vertebral body increases the stiffness and strength considerably from what would be expected for the isolated tissue alone (181 vs. 44 MPa).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, the discongruency between the cylindrical shape of the cage and the wedge-shaped intervertebral disc space in the sagittal plane could result in destruction of the posterior part of the L5 endplate. If so, the posterior part of the cage, which is supposed to resist a considerable amount of compressive force, will rest on the softer cancellous vertebral body bone [2,6,16]. The decrease of posterior intervertebral disc height during this time is a result of the subsidence of the cage into the posterior part of the vertebral body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of bone material is a complicated function of its composition and organization, which is still poorly understood. In addition, its incorporation into a complex structure such as the proximal femur or a vertebra, can markedly affect its properties [2,3], appearing stiffer and stronger than when tested in isolation. Bone in the femoral neck assumes two structural forms, trabecular and cortical, which occupy different fractions of the volume of the neck on passing distally from the femoral head to the intertrochanteric region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%