2011
DOI: 10.2478/s11536-011-0001-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stieda process versus Haglund’s deformity: An uncommon presentation of posterior ankle impingement

Abstract: AbstractPosterior ankle impingement syndrome represents an important cause of chronic ankle pain and has been extensively described in the orthopaedic and radiology literature. A rare case of this painful hindfoot disorder that resulted from two concurrent developmental anomalies is presented herein.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy is recommended for diagnostic tests (Yilmaz and Eskandari 2006). MRI is required to confirm if the PAIS caused by SP (Perdikakis and Karantanas 2011). MRI detects the bony and softtissue abnormalities related to the PAIS (Bureau et al 2000), and it is helpful in the assessment of abnormal signal intensity in the SP (Bureau et al 2000), such as high signal intensity on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images/ STIR sequences and low signal intensity on T1-weighted images (Cerezal et al 2003;Robinson and White 2002).…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy is recommended for diagnostic tests (Yilmaz and Eskandari 2006). MRI is required to confirm if the PAIS caused by SP (Perdikakis and Karantanas 2011). MRI detects the bony and softtissue abnormalities related to the PAIS (Bureau et al 2000), and it is helpful in the assessment of abnormal signal intensity in the SP (Bureau et al 2000), such as high signal intensity on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images/ STIR sequences and low signal intensity on T1-weighted images (Cerezal et al 2003;Robinson and White 2002).…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%