1974
DOI: 10.1002/jobm.3630140709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stickstoff-Fixierung in Küstengewässern der mittleren Ostsee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that 240 000 km 2 is a representative area of the Baltic Proper (Rolff et al 2007), we calculated an annual input of fixed nitrogen to new production in the order of 56 000 to 125 000 t (Table 3). This estimate is within the range of some of the earlier studies , Brattberg 1980, Niemistö et al 1989, Hübel & Hübel 1995, Rahm et al 2000, but significantly lower than most recent studies , Wasmund et al 2001, 2005, Rolff et al 2007). In a recent study, Rolff et al (2007) showed that the abundance of Aphanizomenon (one of the major contributors to N 2 fixation) was higher and lasted longer through the summer at all stations south of Stn BY31 in the Baltic Sea.…”
Section: Significance Of N 2 Fixation In the Baltic Seasupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that 240 000 km 2 is a representative area of the Baltic Proper (Rolff et al 2007), we calculated an annual input of fixed nitrogen to new production in the order of 56 000 to 125 000 t (Table 3). This estimate is within the range of some of the earlier studies , Brattberg 1980, Niemistö et al 1989, Hübel & Hübel 1995, Rahm et al 2000, but significantly lower than most recent studies , Wasmund et al 2001, 2005, Rolff et al 2007). In a recent study, Rolff et al (2007) showed that the abundance of Aphanizomenon (one of the major contributors to N 2 fixation) was higher and lasted longer through the summer at all stations south of Stn BY31 in the Baltic Sea.…”
Section: Significance Of N 2 Fixation In the Baltic Seasupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This observation emphasizes the need for a sampling strategy with high spatial diversity and high temporal frequency in biogeochemical studies of the Baltic Sea (Ohlendieck et al 2007, Rolff et al 2007). Our estimates of N s fixation are a close third in rank behind riverine inputs (363 000 t N, Stålnacke et al 1999) Leppänen et al (1988) 167 Niemistö et al (1989) 100 a Hübel & Hübel (1995) 20-190 Rahm et al (2000 30-260 Larsson et al (2001) 180-430 Wasmund et al (2001) 370 Wasmund et al (2005) 434-792 Rolff et al (2007) 310 This study (BY31) 56 - ; Stns H4 and X1) was very variable and the estimates should be regarded with caution. Therefore, we are only considering here the 3 yr annual averages of 65 t N at Stn H4 and 89 t N at Stn X1 (calculated from Table 2).…”
Section: Significance Of N 2 Fixation In the Baltic Seamentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In the following decades, occurrence of this cyanobacterium was rather rare [ 5 ]. Since the 1970s, as a consequence of human-induced eutrophication, the mass development of N. spumigena has become a regular phenomenon [ 5 , 6 ]. In the late 1980s, the production of nodularin (NOD) by the Baltic N. spumigena was reported for the first time [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nodularia spumigena is a filamentous, heterocystous, diazotrophic cyanobacterial species found in the Baltic Sea which commonly blooms during the N -limited summer period. These extensive surface blooms have been reported as common occurrences since the 1970s (Hübel & Hübel 1974) and form an important annual source of new N . N. spumigena and other diazotrophic cyanobacteria assimilate the residual phosphate present after the spring bloom (Kononen et al 1996) and fix atmospheric N, thereby supplying the wider plankton community with bioavailable N .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%