the prolific sexual offending of BBC star Jimmy Savile, and of the institutional complicity that had enabled it (Furedi 2013). While most of the literature on this period treats the cases of Harris and others as merely addendums to the Savile case, there is more to be said about Harris's downfall and its relationship to his celebrity performance of an Australian 'bloke' in the UK. Although it came after the exposure of several other prominent British celebrities, the revelations of Harris's offending were frequently described as the 'most painful' of this period (Hattenstone 2014, p. 32). Whereas other celebrities such as Savile were retrospectively seen as creepy, Harris, it was repeatedly said, had been above suspicion, a 'slightly embarrassing but harmless joke uncle' (Purves 2014, p. 14). In general, this image meant that Harris, one of Britain's most famous children's entertainers, was accused of betraying not just his victims 'but the very notion of childhood innocence' (Hattenstone 2014, p. 32). In this chapter, I investigate these widespread narratives of shock and betrayal through a discursive analysis of print media in the UK and Australia, beginning with the portrait commission in 2005 and ending with Harris's conviction in 2014. In the first section I explore constructions of Harris as quintessentially innocent. I argue these constructions rested on a set of British colonial tropes of white Australian masculinity that Harris's celebrity both relied upon and reinforced. While relatively unknown outside of the UK and Australia, within Britain Harris was not merely a celebrity Australian but famous for being 'the Greatest Living Australian' (Milmo 2005). In his most famous songs, such as 'Tie me kangaroo down, sport', and 'Jake the Peg', Harris performed tropes of the Australian outback and convict past respectively, working to figure 'Australian-ness' for the British public. Phrases like 'as Australian as Rolf Harris' (Marks 2006, p. 24) found routinely in the British press indicate the extent to which he functioned as a metonym for a dominant vision of Australian culture