2002
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod66.4.1016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steroids Modulate Transepithelial Resistance and Na+ Absorption Across Cultured Porcine Vas Deferens Epithelia1

Abstract: Epithelial cells were isolated from adult porcine vas deferens and grown in the absence or presence of steroid hormones. Transepithelial resistance (R(te)), basal short circuit current (I(sc)), and the effects of selected ion transport modulators on these parameters were evaluated in modified Ussing chambers at three time points (5-8, 11-14, and 18-22 days postseeding). At the earliest time point, no significant differences were observed. At the middle time point, when compared with R(te) in untreated control … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(32 reference statements)
4
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we would speculate that in this duct, the high NADP(H)-dependent 11bHSD activities, which we observed in this region, may be important in modulating the potential effects of GCs on ion and fluid transport. In light of the presence of sodium-proton co-transporters, any steroidal control of sodium flux within the caput epididymidis would be expected to alter the luminal pH and hence affect the final maturation of sperm in this duct (Pushkin et al 2000, Phillips & Schultz 2002. Previous studies have also reported a predominant 11KSR activity in the rat cauda epididymidis (Waddell et al 2003).…”
Section: I V E R K I D N E Y T E S T I S C a P U T C O R P U S C A mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we would speculate that in this duct, the high NADP(H)-dependent 11bHSD activities, which we observed in this region, may be important in modulating the potential effects of GCs on ion and fluid transport. In light of the presence of sodium-proton co-transporters, any steroidal control of sodium flux within the caput epididymidis would be expected to alter the luminal pH and hence affect the final maturation of sperm in this duct (Pushkin et al 2000, Phillips & Schultz 2002. Previous studies have also reported a predominant 11KSR activity in the rat cauda epididymidis (Waddell et al 2003).…”
Section: I V E R K I D N E Y T E S T I S C a P U T C O R P U S C A mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies indicated that normal systemic levels of glucocorticoids may be required for post-natal development of the testis (Weber et al, 2000), fluid transport across the epithelium of the excurrent duct system (Au et al, 1978;Turner & Cesarini, 1983;Phillips & Schultz, 2002) and control of ejaculation and erectile function (Penson et al, 1997;Corona et al, 2012). Experimental conditions in which bilateral adrenalectomy was employed to manipulate the circulating levels of adrenal steroids further indicate an involvement of glucocorticoids in the modulation of spermatogenesis and testicular steroidogenesis (Lescoat et al, 1982;Saxena & Paul, 1987, 1988Gao et al, 1997;Weber et al, 2000), as well as in the fluid reabsorption by epithelial cells from the epididymis and vas deferens (Au et al, 1978;Turner & Cesarini, 1983;Phillips & Schultz, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies indicated that normal systemic levels of glucocorticoids may be required for post-natal development of the testis (Weber et al, 2000), fluid transport across the epithelium of the excurrent duct system (Au et al, 1978;Turner & Cesarini, 1983;Phillips & Schultz, 2002) and control of ejaculation and erectile function (Penson et al, 1997;Corona et al, 2012). Experimental conditions in which bilateral adrenalectomy was employed to manipulate the circulating levels of adrenal steroids further indicate an involvement of glucocorticoids in the modulation of spermatogenesis and testicular steroidogenesis (Lescoat et al, 1982;Saxena & Paul, 1987, 1988Gao et al, 1997;Weber et al, 2000), as well as in the fluid reabsorption by epithelial cells from the epididymis and vas deferens (Au et al, 1978;Turner & Cesarini, 1983;Phillips & Schultz, 2002). In agreement with these observations, the differential expression of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isoforms in tissues from the male reproductive tract of different species (Schultz et al, 1993;Mohler et al, 1996;Weber et al, 2000;Biagini & Pich, 2002;Waddell et al, 2003;Sharp et al, 2007;Silva et al, 2010;Gladstones et al, 2012;Cabrera-Sharp et al, 2013) indicate that they are targets for glucocorticoid actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FBS-induced reduction in TER was circumvented by pretreatment of the cells with the estrogen receptor antagonist, ICI 182,780, indicating that epithelial monolayer integrity is directly influenced by E 2 via its receptor. Estradiol has also been shown to disrupt adheren junctions in endothelial cells [27] and to decrease TER in porcine vas deferens epithelia [28].…”
Section: Transepithelial Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%