1998
DOI: 10.1021/jm970527v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steroidal and Nonsteroidal Sulfamates as Potent Inhibitors of Steroid Sulfatase

Abstract: Synthetic routes to potent steroidal and nonsteroidal sulfamate-based active site-directed inhibitors of the enzyme steroid sulfatase, a topical target in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer, are described. Novel compounds were examined for estrone sulfatase (E1-STS) inhibition in intact MCF-7 breast cancer cells and placental microsomes. Reaction of the sodium salt of estrone with sulfamoyl chloride gave estrone 3-O-sulfamate (EMATE, 2) which inhibits E1-STS activity pot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
136
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
136
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…42 It is interesting to note that oestrogen sulphamates are also potent irreversible inhibitors of steroid sulphatase (STS), an enzyme responsible for the production of biologically active oestrogens in hormone-dependent breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer cells. [43][44][45] The importance of STS in the progression of hormone-dependent tumours has been well documented. 43,44 It has been reported previously that C-2-substituted sulphamoylated oestrogens, such as 2-MeOEMATE and 2-MeOE2bisMATE, also inhibited STS enzyme both in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42 It is interesting to note that oestrogen sulphamates are also potent irreversible inhibitors of steroid sulphatase (STS), an enzyme responsible for the production of biologically active oestrogens in hormone-dependent breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer cells. [43][44][45] The importance of STS in the progression of hormone-dependent tumours has been well documented. 43,44 It has been reported previously that C-2-substituted sulphamoylated oestrogens, such as 2-MeOEMATE and 2-MeOE2bisMATE, also inhibited STS enzyme both in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45] The importance of STS in the progression of hormone-dependent tumours has been well documented. 43,44 It has been reported previously that C-2-substituted sulphamoylated oestrogens, such as 2-MeOEMATE and 2-MeOE2bisMATE, also inhibited STS enzyme both in vitro and in vivo. 46,47 2-Ethyl-substituted compounds such as 2-EtE2-MATE and 2-EtE2bisMATE also inhibit STS activity with IC 50 values of 0.92 and 0.9 lM, respectively, in placental microsomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first potent inhibitor based on the coumarin scaffold with significantly reduced estrogenic properties was 4-methyl-coumarin-7-O-sulfamate (1), Fig. 1 (COUMATE), which exhibited good activity with an IC 50 value of 380 nM when evaluated against placental microsomes [4]. Further modification of its structure led to a wide range of more potent compounds based on tricyclic coumarin derivatives containing sulfamate moiety that mimic the ABC rings of the natural substrate, e.g., 667-COUMATE (2), Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, the same research group synthesized a series of fluorinated 3-phenylcoumarin-7-O-sulfamates [10]. The most active compounds designing so far-3-(3,4-difluorophenyl)-coumarin-7-O-sulfamate (4) The described above process of development of new steroid sulfatase inhibitors is expensive, time consuming, and requires collaboration of experts from different disciplines, such as: biology, chemistry, biochemistry, pharmacology, etc. However, according to recently recommended ideas in designing new drugs [11], this challenging process could be supported by a computational chemistry [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical structures of all the compounds were elucidated by a comparison of their melting point, 1 H NMR and 13 C NMR, data with literatures. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Compounds 13 and 14 were biosynthesized from substrates 4 and 5 under the same process in the literature. 8) Compound 15 was identified by MS and NMR spectra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%