2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2880873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sterilized Intervention and Optimal Chinese Monetary Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…unanticipated operations or via a preannounced rule) to affect volatility of the exchange rate and the transmission mechanism of the interest rate and found that: central bank intervention has a strong interaction with monetary policy in general equilibrium; central bank intervention rules can have stronger stabilisation power than discretion in response to shocks because they exploit the expectations channel and there are some trade-offs in the use of central bank intervention since it can help isolate the economy from external financial shocks, but it prevents some necessary adjustments to the exchange rate as a response to nominal and real external shocks. Cun and Li (2016) showed that both M2 and bank credit had significantly increased during the sterilized intervention period, regardless of monetary base being kept unaffected, implying an increase in money multiplier. As banks' holdings of central bank bills increase, they hold less excess reserves, leading to a higher money multiplier and expansions of banks' balance sheets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…unanticipated operations or via a preannounced rule) to affect volatility of the exchange rate and the transmission mechanism of the interest rate and found that: central bank intervention has a strong interaction with monetary policy in general equilibrium; central bank intervention rules can have stronger stabilisation power than discretion in response to shocks because they exploit the expectations channel and there are some trade-offs in the use of central bank intervention since it can help isolate the economy from external financial shocks, but it prevents some necessary adjustments to the exchange rate as a response to nominal and real external shocks. Cun and Li (2016) showed that both M2 and bank credit had significantly increased during the sterilized intervention period, regardless of monetary base being kept unaffected, implying an increase in money multiplier. As banks' holdings of central bank bills increase, they hold less excess reserves, leading to a higher money multiplier and expansions of banks' balance sheets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%