2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.121802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sterile Neutrino Search at the NEOS Experiment

Abstract: An experiment to search for light sterile neutrinos is conducted at a reactor with a thermal power of 2.8 GW located at the Hanbit nuclear power complex. The search is done with a detector consisting of a ton of Gd-loaded liquid scintillator in a tendon gallery approximately 24 m from the reactor core. The measured antineutrino event rate is 1976 per day with a signal to background ratio of about 22. The shape of the antineutrino energy spectrum obtained from the eight-month data-taking period is compared with… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
312
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
16
312
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of HEU-based experiments have thus far not demonstrated the level of background rejection necessary to achieve the 1∶1 signal-to-background ratio (S:B) assumed in this study [46,55,57]. On the other hand, other short-baseline efforts have either already achieved a S:B ratio far surpassing 1∶1 at LEU reactors [56] or have presented prototype-and Monte Carlo-based evidence to support their achievement of a S:B of 1∶1 or higher at HEU reactors [35,37]. To examine the impact of the S:B on IBD yield precision, we adjust the assumed S:B of all short-baseline measurements in data sets 2-5, while continuing to neglect background contributions for the Daya Bay-like measurements of data sets 1-3.…”
Section: Impact Of Variations In Experimental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of HEU-based experiments have thus far not demonstrated the level of background rejection necessary to achieve the 1∶1 signal-to-background ratio (S:B) assumed in this study [46,55,57]. On the other hand, other short-baseline efforts have either already achieved a S:B ratio far surpassing 1∶1 at LEU reactors [56] or have presented prototype-and Monte Carlo-based evidence to support their achievement of a S:B of 1∶1 or higher at HEU reactors [35,37]. To examine the impact of the S:B on IBD yield precision, we adjust the assumed S:B of all short-baseline measurements in data sets 2-5, while continuing to neglect background contributions for the Daya Bay-like measurements of data sets 1-3.…”
Section: Impact Of Variations In Experimental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of new ton-scale compact reactor antineutrino experiments have either recently been deployed [55][56][57] or will be deployed in the near future [35][36][37] at short baselines from operating LEU [55,56] or HEU [35][36][37] reactors. These experiments' detectors incorporate a wide variety of detection technologies and background rejection techniques to detect an IBD signal despite sizable cosmogenic and ambient backgrounds in their near-surface, nearreactor environments.…”
Section: A Definition Of Experimental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3+1) and (3+2) phenomenological models. While recent reactor experiments such as DANSS [123] and NEOS [124] have improved the statistical significance of an additional eV-scale sterile state, when combined with the ν e appearance data of MiniBooNE they are in strong tension with the observed ν µ → ν µ accelerator neutrino disappearance of the MINOS, NOνA and IceCube experiments.…”
Section: Active-sterile Neutrino Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26]. We omit the recent MINOS+ [21], IceCube [20] and NEOS [18] constraints from the global fits, although we note that in the future those constraints should be included for more quantitatively accurate results. We expect that the qualitative conclusions drawn in this work stand regardless of inclusion of these more recent constraints in the fit or not.…”
Section: Globally Allowed (3 + N)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11]) dictate that the reactor anomaly cannot yet be interpreted decisively as a light sterile neutrino oscillation signature; such interpretations should await either improved reactor antineutrino flux modelling or dedicated searches for light sterile neutrino oscillations at reactor short baselines which are sensitive to distortions in reconstructed event spectra that are L=E dependent. Such searches are now under way with a number of experiments [12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%