2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-004-0220-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sterile Fluid Collections in Acute Pancreatitis: Catheter Drainage Versus Simple Aspiration

Abstract: There is no apparent clinical benefit for catheter drainage of sterile fluid collections arising in acute pancreatitis as the length of hospital stay and mortality were similar between patients undergoing aspiration versus catheter drainage. However, almost half of patients treated with simple aspiration will require surgical or percutaneous drainage at some point. Disadvantages of chronic catheter drainage include a greater than 50% rate of bacterial colonization and the need for multiple sinograms and tube c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those who are against drainage treatment claim that it is the treatment itself which causes the dreadful complication, the infection of the fluid. According to the literature the rate of iatrogenous infection is about 8-27% [12,25,28,40]. Walser, Zerem et al report a very high, 50% rate of infection which is, in our opinion, the result of the irrigation 2-3 times a day [40,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Those who are against drainage treatment claim that it is the treatment itself which causes the dreadful complication, the infection of the fluid. According to the literature the rate of iatrogenous infection is about 8-27% [12,25,28,40]. Walser, Zerem et al report a very high, 50% rate of infection which is, in our opinion, the result of the irrigation 2-3 times a day [40,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the literature the rate of iatrogenous infection is about 8-27% [12,25,28,40]. Walser, Zerem et al report a very high, 50% rate of infection which is, in our opinion, the result of the irrigation 2-3 times a day [40,44]. To determine the correct rate of iatregenous infections treated without drainage or puncture a prospective randomized trial should be performed which is not available at this time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations