1992
DOI: 10.1039/p29920001443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sterically hindered free radicals. Part 20. EPR and ENDOR spectroscopy of α-carbonyl radicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4B, gray, see Figs. S4, S11, S12 for details), which is in consistent with previously reported data for α-carbonyl radicals (35,36).…”
Section: Radical Addition and Subsequent Set Reductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4B, gray, see Figs. S4, S11, S12 for details), which is in consistent with previously reported data for α-carbonyl radicals (35,36).…”
Section: Radical Addition and Subsequent Set Reductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The acquired spectrum confirmed the formation of the identical radical intermediate assigned as radical adduct R3• (Figure B, green spectrum). This radical exhibits degenerated hyperfine splitting from α- and β-C–H (3 a H = −1.99 mT), as revealed by the simulated steady-state EPR spectrum (Figure B, gray; see Figures S4, S11, S12 for details), which is inconsistent with previously reported data for α-carbonyl radicals. , …”
contrasting
confidence: 88%
“…This radical exhibits degenerated hyperfine splitting from αand β-C−H (3a H = −1.99 mT), as revealed by the simulated steady-state EPR spectrum (Figure 4B, gray; see Figures S4, S11, S12 for details), which is inconsistent with previously reported data for α-carbonyl radicals. 24,25 By monitoring the designated peak corresponding to radical adduct R3• in the PMP/DMAP/1/PC1 reaction system with varying concentrations of acceptor 1, we observed concentration-dependent changes in the kinetic profile of this radical intermediate (Figure 4C). Nonlinear fitting of the acquired kinetic data allowed us to obtain the second-order rate constant of 8.2 × 10 5 M −1 s −1 for the radical addition (Figure 4C, inset; see Figure S14 and Table S3 for details), which is consistent with the magnitudes of the reported rate constants for the addition of α-aminoalkyl radicals to methyl acrylate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantitative analysis of the obtained kinetic data by means of linear free energy relationships was performed for the derivatives with meta and para substituents. The ortho-substituted benzofuranones 14 − 16 were omitted because of possible steric hindrance effects . Figure shows the plot of the logarithmic quenching rate constants versus the Hammett substituent constants σ , according to the Hammett equation (log k q = log k 0 + ρσ ), which yielded a satisfactory linear relation ( r = 0.886, n = 13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%