2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6sc02640k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steric ploy for alternating donor–acceptor co-assembly and cooperative supramolecular polymerization

Abstract: The presence of a bulky peripheral wedge destabilizes the homo-assembly of an amide functionalized acceptor monomer and thereby enables alternating supramolecular copolymerization with an amide appended donor monomer via the synergistic effect of H-bonding and the charge-transfer interaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature-dependent variations correspond to the J-type π–π stacking aggregation. The degree of aggregation (α agg ) as a function of temperature depicts a sigmoidal trend, which fits the isodesmic chain growth model of supramolecular polymerization ( R 2 = 0.996) . Some thermodynamic parameters could then be deduced from this model.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The temperature-dependent variations correspond to the J-type π–π stacking aggregation. The degree of aggregation (α agg ) as a function of temperature depicts a sigmoidal trend, which fits the isodesmic chain growth model of supramolecular polymerization ( R 2 = 0.996) . Some thermodynamic parameters could then be deduced from this model.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The degree of aggregation (α agg ) as a function of temperature depicts a sigmoidal trend, which fits the isodesmic chain growth model of supramolecular polymerization (R 2 = 0.996). 30 Some thermodynamic parameters could then be deduced from this model. The enthalpy release (ΔH iso ) during the chain elongation is −1088.9 kJ mol −1 , along with the equilibrium constant (K iso = 2.94 × 10 4 M −1 ) at the melting temperature (T m = 315.0 K).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the size of the side‐chain substituent increases from methyl in F1⋅Q to ethyl in F13⋅Q, the arrangement changes from Class 1 to Class 3. Mixed stacking is found to be favored with increasing size of elements (S in F7⋅Q and F9⋅Q, Se in F10⋅Q, and Te in F11⋅Q) and the length of the side chain substituted on F (F7⋅Q, F9⋅Q, F10⋅Q, and F11⋅Q) and Q (in F⋅Q2), which sheds light on the role of steric hindrance in directing the nature of packing in the studied Fx⋅Q and F⋅Qy co‐crystals. However, the nearly planar non‐steric F8 also forms a Class 2 co‐crystal with Q (F8⋅Q), perhaps because of the higher interaction between the nearly flat electron‐delocalized F derivative with the acceptor Q.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the size of the side-chain substituent increases from methyl in F1·Q to ethyl in F13·Q, the arrangement changes from Class 1t oC lass 3. Mixed stacking is found to be favored with increasing size of elements (S in F7·Q and F9·Q, Se in F10·Q, and Te in F11·Q) and the length of the side chain substituted on F( F7·Q, F9·Q, F10·Q, and F11·Q) and Q( in F·Q2), which sheds light on the role of steric hindrance [82][83][84] in direct- Pendas' interacting quantum atoms (IQA) approach [55] was employed to further characterize the nature of the S···S interactions and comprehendt heir significance in directingt he cofacial stacking and sidewise parallel-displaced arrangement of D-D in Class 1a nd Class 2s ystems. IQA analysis was performed on 1) F6-F6 and F6a-F6a sidewise parallel-displaced dimers that exhibitedS ···S interactions ( Figure S5 a,b, Supporting Information), 2) the F6-F6 co-facial dimer that indicated C···S interactions ( Figure S5 c, Supporting Information), and 3) the F3·Q trimer that exhibited S···S interactions (FigureS5d,S upporting Information).…”
Section: Classmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…If R > 1, homointeractions are more favored; if R < 1, heterointeractions are favored. In the former case of self-sorted homopolymers where R approaches infinity, the monomers can distinguish between self and nonself in the system. , In the latter case of alternating copolymers where R < 1, the introduction of strong heterointeractions, such as charge transfer interactions and electrostatic interactions, between monomers gives perfectly alternating supramolecular copolymers. However, most cases are often not under these extreme, yet simple, conditions. , Therefore, it is important to unravel the complexity and predict the microstructures of supramolecular copolymer systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%