1977
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90645-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotyped behaviour patterns and hyperactivity induced by amphetamine and apomorphine after discrete 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of extrapyramidal and mesolimbic nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Locomotion induced by low doses of AMPH is thought to be mediated mainly by DA activity in the meso-accumbens DA pathway, based on studies employing lesions of DA pathways, pharmacological manipulation of DA and noradrenaline transmission, and metabolic mapping with 2-deoxyglucose (e.g., Creese and Iversen 1975;Roberts et al 1975;Costall et al 1977;Porrino et al 1984). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Locomotion induced by low doses of AMPH is thought to be mediated mainly by DA activity in the meso-accumbens DA pathway, based on studies employing lesions of DA pathways, pharmacological manipulation of DA and noradrenaline transmission, and metabolic mapping with 2-deoxyglucose (e.g., Creese and Iversen 1975;Roberts et al 1975;Costall et al 1977;Porrino et al 1984). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test if these birth procedures affected DA function of relevance to schizophrenia, several behaviors were examined in these animals as adults. AMPHinduced locomotion was measured since behavioral and biochemical studies indicate that locomotion induced by low dose AMPH is most likely due to increased activity in the meso-accumbens DA pathway (e.g., Creese and Iversen 1975;Roberts et al 1975;Costall et al 1977;Porrino et al 1984).…”
Section: Schizophrenia Is Associated With Increased Birth Complicatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that report, however, there was no description as to whether TRH acted on presynaptic or post synaptic sites of the DA neurons. The focal, intracerebral injection of 6-OHDA would appear to produce a selective lesion in the DA system, and this technique has been employed by some investigators to analyze the role of various DA-containing areas in behavioral effects of central stimulants, for instance, the spontaneous motor stimulatory action of DA receptor agonist is found to be markedly enhanced in rats with 6-OHDA injected either into the mesolimbic DA pathway or into the NAS containing DA nerve terminals (9,22,23). This phenomenon is thought to be due to supersensitivity by 6-OHDA.…”
Section: Effect Of Pretreatment With Pargyline or A-methyltyrosine (Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in their subsequent report (22), amphetamine-induced locomotor stimulation was not reduced in 6-OHDA lesioned rats but was significantly attenuated in pargyline and/or desipramine-pretreated 6-OHDA lesioned rats. Costall et al (23) have reported that bilateral injection of 6-OHDA into the NAS or into the DA pathway fails to modify the intensity of amphetamine hyperactivity although the duration of the effect was reduced. In the present investigation, the hyperactivity response to TRH or methampheta mine, which is probably similar to amphetamine in mode of action, was not attenuated by 6-OHDA injection into the mesolimbic DA pathway.…”
Section: Effect Of Pretreatment With Pargyline or A-methyltyrosine (Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies have suggested that frontal cortical DA has a role opposite to its counterpart in mesolimbic or extrapyramidal DA areas (Carter and Pycock, 1978), where DA-dependent hyperactivity and stereotypy are believed to be mediated (Costall et al, 1977). The inhibitory role initially ascribed to frontal cortical DA stemmed from 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) studies demonstrating that frontal cortical DA depletion produced hyperactivity after a period of 7-10 d (Pycock et al, 1980a;Robinson and Stitt, 1981;Joyce et al, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%