2013
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotype Threat and the Student‐athlete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The K-12 peer effects literature indicates that an increased proportion of black peers may lower academic performance, although the magnitude 2. Dee (2014) provides an example in economics. Student athletes, particularly males, may be stereotyped as "dumb jocks."…”
Section: Racial Peer Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The K-12 peer effects literature indicates that an increased proportion of black peers may lower academic performance, although the magnitude 2. Dee (2014) provides an example in economics. Student athletes, particularly males, may be stereotyped as "dumb jocks."…”
Section: Racial Peer Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…regarding their lack of intelligence and rigor of coursework (Sailes, 1996), especially male student-athletes in the revenue generating sports of football and basketball (Shulman & Bowen, 2001) at highly selective universities (Dee, 2014). In addition to athletic stigmas, empirical evidence has revealed that there are stereotypes within institutions reflecting Black students' insufficient academic and intellectual capabilities at PWIs (Littleton, 2003) and Black athletes'…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from Dee's (2014) experimental design found that the academic stigma associated with being a student-athlete at a highly selective college or university makes a substantial contribution to their academic underperformance, particularly for males. Stone et al (1999) found that the people most negatively affected by the threat of conforming to a negative stereotype are those whose sense of self-worth is connected to the outcome of their performance in the stereotype threatened domain.…”
Section: Negative Impact Of Stereotype Threat On Black Student-athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This anxiety can effectively become self-fulfilling by impeding academic performance. In an economic model of student effort, ST can be modeled as a negative shock to the production function that maps student effort into valued skills (Dee, 2014). When effort is a complement to native ability in the production of skills, a negative ST shock unambiguously reduces student effort and, by implication, academic outcomes.…”
Section: Social Identity and Achievement Gaps-theory And Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When effort is a complement to native ability in the production of skills, a negative ST shock unambiguously reduces student effort and, by implication, academic outcomes. However, in situations where students see increased effort as a substitute for ability, a negative ability shock due to ST would increase student effort and, perhaps even, student performance (Dee, 2014). This may explain the small number of anomalous findings that female students exerted more effort when confronted with an offensive cartoon that deprecated the ability of females to do math (i.e., they may view the "priming" as absurd and offensive and respond with increased effort).…”
Section: Social Identity and Achievement Gaps-theory And Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%