2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69217-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Prevent Local Recurrence of Brain Metastasis After Surgery: Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the adverse events related to surgery, namely brain tissue manipulation with injury to the functional cortex and white matter tracts, and WBRT, namely neurotoxicity with neurocognitive impairment, SRS gained increasing interest as stand-alone or adjunct therapy for 1–3 BMs [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]. As large BMs (>3 cm) causing intracranial hypertension with neurological deficits requiring surgery, adjuvant SRS to the postoperative cavity has been largely investigated, with 1-year LC rates ranging 70–90% and variable OS achieved across several retrospective cohorts [ 53 ]. Two randomized trials confirmed that postoperative SRS correlated with higher LC rates but also superior risks of LM compared to surgery alone [ 9 ], and with lower neurocognitive deficits but also inferior distant intracranial control compared to postoperative WBRT [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to the adverse events related to surgery, namely brain tissue manipulation with injury to the functional cortex and white matter tracts, and WBRT, namely neurotoxicity with neurocognitive impairment, SRS gained increasing interest as stand-alone or adjunct therapy for 1–3 BMs [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]. As large BMs (>3 cm) causing intracranial hypertension with neurological deficits requiring surgery, adjuvant SRS to the postoperative cavity has been largely investigated, with 1-year LC rates ranging 70–90% and variable OS achieved across several retrospective cohorts [ 53 ]. Two randomized trials confirmed that postoperative SRS correlated with higher LC rates but also superior risks of LM compared to surgery alone [ 9 ], and with lower neurocognitive deficits but also inferior distant intracranial control compared to postoperative WBRT [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was confirmed by the 20% dose reduction implemented across all included studies [ 27 , 28 ]. NaSRT is also expected to reduce the risk of post-surgery tumor spillage and LM, especially with piecemeal resection, by pre-treating cancer cells fated for intraoperative transposition and seeding with the CSF [ 29 , 53 ]. Despite the envisioned advantages, potential pitfalls of NaSRT approaches should also be noted, namely the lack of histological confirmation before starting radiation protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, investigators have explored the role for neoadjuvant SRS in the treatment of oligometastatic disease. While no clinical trial to date has evaluated the efficacy of SRS in the neoadjuvant role ( 53 ), one combination prospective/retrospective study has suggested that it is safe and does not increase the risk of radiation necrosis or leptomeningeal spread of disease ( 54 ); further studies are currently underway ( 55 , 56 ).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%