2011
DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-6-48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis

Abstract: Purposeto investigate the factors affecting survival and toxicity in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), with special attention to volumes of brain receiving a specific dose (V10 - V16 Gy) as predictors for brain radionecrosis.Patients and MethodsTwo hundred six consecutive patients with 310 cerebral metastases less than 3.5 cm were treated with SRS as primary treatment and followed prospectively at University of Rome La Sapienza Sant'Andrea Hospital. Overall survival, brain control, and loc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

24
428
7
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 627 publications
(469 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
24
428
7
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This is higher than for the iPlan plans that have been our clinical standard prior to introducing the VMAT technique but since Gamma Knife plans typically use a PTV D max >140% we accepted this higher inhomogeneity to reduce the GI. The risk of radiation necrosis following cranial SRS has been reported in several studies 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. More data are needed to determine if the difference in dose distribution between the planning techniques have potential clinical consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is higher than for the iPlan plans that have been our clinical standard prior to introducing the VMAT technique but since Gamma Knife plans typically use a PTV D max >140% we accepted this higher inhomogeneity to reduce the GI. The risk of radiation necrosis following cranial SRS has been reported in several studies 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. More data are needed to determine if the difference in dose distribution between the planning techniques have potential clinical consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The CI was calculated for each metastasis in the Gamma Knife and CyberKnife planning systems; however, the CI could only be calculated for the sum of the metastases in the VMAT and TomoTherapy planning systems. The total volume of brain receiving 16,12,8, and 4 Gy was also calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 In the setting of SRS without WBRT, the volumes of CNS tissue that receives 10 and 12 Gy have been consistently shown to correlate with risk of RN. 23,28,34 In addition to 10-and 12-Gy volumes, Sneed et al identified capecitabine/fluorouracil use within 1 Advances in Radiation Oncology: OctobereDecember 2016 Recurrent brain metastasis management after SRS affects risk of radiation necrosis month and prior SRS to the same lesion as other independent predictors of ARE after SRS. For locally recurrent metastases treated with repeat SRS, the risk of symptomatic ARE was approximately 20% at 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%