2012
DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.peds10458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, Part 2: management of pediatric patients

Abstract: Object The authors conducted a study to define the long-term outcomes and risks of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Methods Between 1987 and 2006, the authors performed Gamma Knife surgery in 996 patients with brain AVMs; 135 patients were younger than 18 years of age. The median maximum diameter and target volumes were 2.0 cm (range 0.6–5.2 cm) and 2.5 cm3 (range 0.1–17.5 cm3), respectively. The median margin dose was 20 Gy (range 15–25 Gy). Results The actua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
67
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…31 The therapeutic outcomes were relatively homogeneous among the reports, and the associated neurological deficits were minimal (Table 6). 3,15,31,33,39,44 Regarding multidisciplinary treatment, the one reason that there was no difference between the SRS-only group and the combined treatment group in terms of treatment outcomes can be attributable to this study being a retrospective analysis looking at whether treatment options other than SRS were applied or not, depending on careful consideration of the patient situation, such as existence of hematoma, location of the lesions, accompanying aneurysms, and high-flow shunts. Further, the limitations of this study include the lack of statistical power due to a small patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The therapeutic outcomes were relatively homogeneous among the reports, and the associated neurological deficits were minimal (Table 6). 3,15,31,33,39,44 Regarding multidisciplinary treatment, the one reason that there was no difference between the SRS-only group and the combined treatment group in terms of treatment outcomes can be attributable to this study being a retrospective analysis looking at whether treatment options other than SRS were applied or not, depending on careful consideration of the patient situation, such as existence of hematoma, location of the lesions, accompanying aneurysms, and high-flow shunts. Further, the limitations of this study include the lack of statistical power due to a small patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The use of MRI as the sole modality to document obliteration has been reported by authors from another tertiary radiosurgery referral center in a large recent series of radiosurgery in AVMs . [19][20][21][22][23][24] As to the AVMs that received preradiosurgery embolization in the present study, we do not have specific information regarding the goal of embolization in each case, nor do we know if the goal of embolization was achieved in each case. The lack of these data may affect our perspective on the role of embolization in the management of AVMs, especially in relation to radiosurgery.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] It is characterized by high obliteration rates, especially in small lesions, and low risk of adverse effects and complications. In the present retrospective study, we were not able to demonstrate an association of the optimal K index dose with improved obliteration rates, in comparison with smaller doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotactic radiosurgery has gained popularity in recent years. 1,2,4,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12]21 Its effect on the obliteration of AVMs is gradual, with patients remaining at risk for hemorrhage during this latency period. Complete obliteration, after a single session, has been reported to vary between 60% and 80% over 5 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%