2012
DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.jns101740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, Part 1: management of Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II arteriovenous malformations

Abstract: Object. The aim of this paper was to define the outcomes and risks of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for Spetz ler-Martin Grade I and II arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).Methods. Between 1987 and, the authors performed Gamma Knife surgery in 996 patients with brain AVMs, including 217 patients with AVMs classified as SpetzlerMartin Grade I or II. The median maximum diameter and target volumes were 1.9 cm (range 0.5-3.8 cm) and 2.3 cm 3 (range 0.1-14.1 cm 3 ), respectively. The median margin dose was 22 Gy (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
85
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The factors considered in the grading system are size of nidus, the type of venous drainage (superficial vs deep) and the location of AVM in terms of eloquence. Obliteration rates reported following radiosurgery for SM grades I and II range between 80% and 93% [9,30]. The obliteration rates following radiosurgery for SM grades III ranged from 60% to 72% [22,23].…”
Section: Discussion Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The factors considered in the grading system are size of nidus, the type of venous drainage (superficial vs deep) and the location of AVM in terms of eloquence. Obliteration rates reported following radiosurgery for SM grades I and II range between 80% and 93% [9,30]. The obliteration rates following radiosurgery for SM grades III ranged from 60% to 72% [22,23].…”
Section: Discussion Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary goal of treatment for AVM is the complete obliteration of the AVM, so that the risk of hemorrhage is eliminated [9]. Thus, identifying of the factors associated with higher obliteration rates is important.…”
Section: Discussion Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,21 Furthermore, 66% of the treated patients in ARUBA had Spetzler-Martin grade I or II AVMs, for which resection can be strongly considered at experienced centers, and radiosurgery provides an excellent risk to benefit profile. [22][23][24][25] Radiosurgery is a minimally invasive modality for the treatment of AVMs, and it is especially favorable, relative to microsurgery, for small-to moderate-sized AVMs in eloquent or deep brain areas. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] The results of many previous radiosurgery series are confounded by the inclusion of patients who were previously treated with surgical resection, embolization, and fractionated radiation therapy.…”
Section: February 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotactic radiosurgery has gained popularity in recent years. 1,2,4,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12]21 Its effect on the obliteration of AVMs is gradual, with patients remaining at risk for hemorrhage during this latency period. Complete obliteration, after a single session, has been reported to vary between 60% and 80% over 5 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%