2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic hypofractionated accurate radiotherapy of the prostate (SHARP), 33.5 Gy in five fractions for localized disease: First clinical trial results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
210
6
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
14
210
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…3,[20][21][22][23][24][25]27,28 Similarly, no AEs of grade 3 or higher were found in our study. Overall EPIC bowel scores were high during follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,[20][21][22][23][24][25]27,28 Similarly, no AEs of grade 3 or higher were found in our study. Overall EPIC bowel scores were high during follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…18 Clinical results for hypofractionated photon prostate cancer treatments have also been favorable. 3,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Many different fractionations, from 6.75 Gy in 5 treatments to 10 Gy in 5 treatments, have been used. Our design was based on data published with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer and the published normal tissue ˛/ř atio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bladder and rectum were contoured according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) guidelines [13]. All patients were treated with 6-15 mV photon beams.…”
Section: Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the present the main concern is the uncertainty about normal tissue toxicity of such HF protocols. Although clinical reports [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] have found acceptable levels of morbidity and reasonable PSA control rates using doses of 2.5-3 Gy, clinical data are sparse and, although promising, require further validation. If the hypothesis that the prostate cancer α / β ratio is lower than normal tissue is correct, then the optimal fractional dose is likely to be even higher than the doses tested thus far, but if incorrect, the result may be increased normal tissue toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%