M anaging patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma can be challenging because of the limited systemic therapy options and lack of randomized data to drive management decisions. Although most patients with sarcoma present with localized disease initially, the development of metastases is very common, especially in high-grade tumors. Sarcoma predominately spreads to the lung, although metastases to other organs, such as the liver or bone, are also seen. Many patients who develop metastases will only do so in a limited number of sites. The optimal management of patients with limited volume metastatic disease has been evolving rapidly over the past decade.Aggressive management of low-volume metastatic sarcoma with surgery has been associated with survival rates of approximately 40%. 1 Surgery is the preferred modality to manage oligometastatic disease; however, many patients are not good candidates for surgical resection because of underlying comorbidities. In addition, in selective situations where surgery would require removing a large volume of lung tissue (i.e., lobectomy or pneumectomy), alternative local therapies can be considered.In the current issue of the Cancer Journal, Greto et al. 2 report their experience using lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic sarcoma. Their study shows promising rates of local control (2-year local control, 67%) and survival (2-year overall survival, 40%). In addition, treatment was very well tolerated with no reported toxicities of grade 3 or higher. Factors that resulted in better outcomes included a higher tumor biologically equivalent dose and a longer interval from time of initial diagnosis to development of metastatic disease. Their study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of lung SBRT for oligometastatic sarcoma.Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a well-established treatment modality for treating cancer of the lung. This technology has been extensively studied in early-stage lung cancer patients and is associated with excellent local control and low toxicity rates when using modern techniques. Comparison studies examining lung SBRT and other ablative therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation, suggest that SBRT has improved control rates 3,4 and is more cost-effective. 5 In addition, our understanding of normal tissue dose tolerance and advances in technology including image guidance have made lung SBRT very safe, even in patients with poor underlying lung function.Sarcomas are often inaccurately classified as being radioresistant. In reality, radiation plays an important role in all stages of this disease. Multiple studies have demonstrated the ability of radiation to decrease the risk of local recurrence before or after surgery by more than half. 6,7 Based off these studies, neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation is considered standard of care for most soft tissue sarcomas with high-risk features (e.g., high grade, large size, deep location). Radiation is also indicated for palliation of symptoms related to metastatic ...