1989
DOI: 10.1002/9780470147283.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereospecificity in Enzymology: Its Place in Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this evolutionary diversity, there is no reason that the behavior of a specific DNA polymerase could be extrapolated to the behavior of all polymerase. This is not true for many features of stereochemistry in other classes of enzymes (36). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this evolutionary diversity, there is no reason that the behavior of a specific DNA polymerase could be extrapolated to the behavior of all polymerase. This is not true for many features of stereochemistry in other classes of enzymes (36). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choices made by triosephosphate and by aconitase are well known to be chiral choices between enantiotopic atoms or groups of atoms. The critical point here is that there are a multitude of enzyme catalyzed reactions distinguishing enantiotopic groups in which the product of the reaction would be identical whichever of the enantiotopic groups were chosen (Arigoni and Eliel 1969;Benner et al 1989;Cornforth 1974). Therefore, why should an enzyme bother to make the distinction?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%