1981
DOI: 10.1021/jo00329a015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereospecific syntheses of both diastereomers of (.+-.)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-hexenoic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the transition state (T10) leading to the observed product has no significant steric interactions. 129 stituted alkenes also shows a preference for hydrogen transfer from the alkyl group cis to the alkenyl hydrogen.…”
Section: B Regloselectlonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the transition state (T10) leading to the observed product has no significant steric interactions. 129 stituted alkenes also shows a preference for hydrogen transfer from the alkyl group cis to the alkenyl hydrogen.…”
Section: B Regloselectlonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UC5159) (Kelly et al 1969) and 2S-(-)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-hexenoic acid from Boletus, section Ixocomus, group Nudi (Rudzats et al 1972;Gellert et al 1973), were isolated. Rudzats et al reported the absolute stereochemistry was 2S,4S (Gellert et al 1978); however, Snider and Dunčia corrected the stereochemistry to 2S,4R and determined 2S-(+)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-hexenoic acid as 2S,4S stereochemistry (Snider & Dunčia 1981). There are two symmetric carbons in 1, and the relative stereochemistry was determined by comparison of 1 H-NMR in D 2 O with synthesized diastereomers pairs (racemic mixtures) (Snider & Dunčia 1981).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rudzats et al reported the absolute stereochemistry was 2S,4S (Gellert et al 1978); however, Snider and Dunčia corrected the stereochemistry to 2S,4R and determined 2S-(+)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-hexenoic acid as 2S,4S stereochemistry (Snider & Dunčia 1981). There are two symmetric carbons in 1, and the relative stereochemistry was determined by comparison of 1 H-NMR in D 2 O with synthesized diastereomers pairs (racemic mixtures) (Snider & Dunčia 1981). The data of 1 were in accordance with a 2R*,4S* isomer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%