1983
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600720705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereospecific Radioimmunoassays for l-Ephedrine and d-Ephedrine in Human Plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical effects of Mao may be attributed more to ephedrine than pseudoephedrine because the present study found that the concentration profiles of ephedrine were almost 3-fold higher. The reported elimination half life of ephedrine administered as 50 mg of oral racemic ephedrine hydrochloride is 4.8 h with Cmax / values of 100 ng/mL 22) ;those of d-and l-ephedrine are about 8 and 10 h with Cmax values of 100 and 70 / ng/mL under the same administration conditions 23) . These results confirmed the linear kinetic profile of ephedrine at a dose of 50 mg of racemic ephedrine hydrochloride.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clinical effects of Mao may be attributed more to ephedrine than pseudoephedrine because the present study found that the concentration profiles of ephedrine were almost 3-fold higher. The reported elimination half life of ephedrine administered as 50 mg of oral racemic ephedrine hydrochloride is 4.8 h with Cmax / values of 100 ng/mL 22) ;those of d-and l-ephedrine are about 8 and 10 h with Cmax values of 100 and 70 / ng/mL under the same administration conditions 23) . These results confirmed the linear kinetic profile of ephedrine at a dose of 50 mg of racemic ephedrine hydrochloride.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kampo preparations should be clinically evaluated to ensure their efficacy and safety, particularly in relation to the pharmacokinetics of their ingredients. Several studies have shown higher rate constants during the elimination phase compared with values during the absorption phase after the oral administration of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine ORIGINAL 81 alone [20][21][22][23] . The present study showed that the absorption and elimination rate constants were almost identical in 2 volunteers at both doses possibly because of relatively low absorption rate constants in these volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%