1965
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(65)90235-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereospecific binding of estrogens in the rat uterus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many notable differences exist between chick oviduct and mammalian uterus . For example, rat uterus possesses a marked ability to accumulate estrogen due to the presence of a binding substance(s) as shown by Jensen and his coworkers (48,49), and by Gorski and his collaborators (50,51), whereas chick oviduct does not seem to possess such an apparent feature (52) . This apparent lack of a binding substance might be one of the reasons why the minimum threshold dose of estrogen to cause a similar extent of increase in wet weight in 3-5 days is much higher in chick oviduct (1 .6 mg/kg body weight) (2) than in rat uterus (1 µg/kg body weight) (53) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, many notable differences exist between chick oviduct and mammalian uterus . For example, rat uterus possesses a marked ability to accumulate estrogen due to the presence of a binding substance(s) as shown by Jensen and his coworkers (48,49), and by Gorski and his collaborators (50,51), whereas chick oviduct does not seem to possess such an apparent feature (52) . This apparent lack of a binding substance might be one of the reasons why the minimum threshold dose of estrogen to cause a similar extent of increase in wet weight in 3-5 days is much higher in chick oviduct (1 .6 mg/kg body weight) (2) than in rat uterus (1 µg/kg body weight) (53) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The purification of receptor proteins and the availability of respective antibodies permitted the application of immune techniques, that is Western blotting, immunofluorescence, confocal and immunogold electron microscopy, for the identification of glucocorticoid (GR), estrogen (ER), androgen (AR), and thyroid hormone (TR) receptors in mitochondria (Fig. 2, Table 1) (37,(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(66)(67)(68)(69).…”
Section: The Detection Of Steroid and Thyroid Receptors In Mitochondriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First reports for the presence of estrogen receptors in mitochondria were based on the distribution and binding of radioactively labeled ligands (52,66,67). Later, using immunotechniques, ER was detected in mitochondria of rat uterine and ovarian cells (53), of MCF-7 breast cancer cells (16,57), of cultured human lens epithelial cells (55), and of rat hippocampus and neuronal cells (56).…”
Section: The Detection Of Steroid and Thyroid Receptors In Mitochondriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known for some time that oestrogens are taken up by uterine tissue in vitro (Stone and Baggett 1965b;Jensen et al 1966), and that a subcellular distribution of steroids results which is similar to that observed after in vivo administration of oestrogens (Noteboom and Gorski 1965). More importantly, after in vitro incubation of uterine tissue with tritiated oestrogens, the radioactivity is associated with the same 'cytosol' and 'nuclear' macromolecules as after in vivo administration (Jensen et al 1967).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%