Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1978
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(78)80513-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoselectivity in bis(α-amino acid) copper(II) complexes—VII

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…76 Pirkle deemed these interactions insufficient for chiral recognition, since either enantiomer should be able to afford both hydrogen bonds simultaneously with the CSP. He instead proposed a x-dipole stacking of the amides of CSP 10 and analyte (Figure 6) which, because it is a face-to-face Dipole-stacking model Figure 6. Hydrogen bonding versus dipole stacking for chiral recognition of iV-acyl-a-amino amides on CSP 10.…”
Section: Donor-acceptor Cspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76 Pirkle deemed these interactions insufficient for chiral recognition, since either enantiomer should be able to afford both hydrogen bonds simultaneously with the CSP. He instead proposed a x-dipole stacking of the amides of CSP 10 and analyte (Figure 6) which, because it is a face-to-face Dipole-stacking model Figure 6. Hydrogen bonding versus dipole stacking for chiral recognition of iV-acyl-a-amino amides on CSP 10.…”
Section: Donor-acceptor Cspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of T iso in enantioselective liquid chromatography was predicted in 1978 by Davankov et al and in enantioselective gas chromatography in 1984 by Koppenhoefer and Bayer . First examples were independently observed by Musso et al in liquid chromatography, by Gil-Av et al in hydrogen-bonding GC systems, and by Schurig et al in complexation GC (a report of peak inversion for methyl lactate on a modified cyclodextrin selector (Lipodex E) could not be reproduced in our hands).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%