2004
DOI: 10.1002/ange.200460203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoselective Total Synthesis of (−)‐Borrelidin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…=+5.4, c =0.5 in CH 2 Cl 2 ); 1 H NMR (499.873 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ =0.83 (d, 3 J =6.5 Hz, 3 H; CH 3 ), 0.84 (d, 3 J =6.6 Hz, 3 H; CH 3 ), 0.90 (d, 3 J =6.8 Hz, 3 H; CH 3 ), 1.04 (d, 3 J =6.9 Hz, 3 H; 2‐CH‐C H 3 ), 0.90–1.00 (m, 1 H), 1.19–1.33 (m, 4 H), 1.36–1.43 (m, 1 H), 1.50–1.65 (m, 2 H), 1.78–1.85 (m, 1 H), 2.35–2.44 (m, 1 H; 2‐CH), 3.16 (dd, 2 J =8.9, 3 J =6.9 Hz, 1 H; 9‐CH 2 ), 3.29 (dd, 2 J =9.1, 3 J =5.2 Hz, 1 H; 9‐CH 2 ), 3.78 (s, 3 H; O‐CH 3 ), 4.38 (d, 2 J =11.7 Hz, 1 H; C H 2 ‐Ar), 4.42 (d, 2 J =11.7 Hz, 1 H; C H 2 ‐Ar), 6.85 (m, 2 H; 3′‐CH), 7.23 (m, 2 H; 2′‐CH), 9.59 (d, 3 J =1.9 Hz, 1 H; ‐C(O)H); 13 C NMR (125.709 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ =13.1 (CH 3 ), 18.3 (CH 3 ), 20.0 (CH 3 ), 20.7 (CH 3 ), 27.4, 27.5, 30.9, 37.0, 41.7, 44.2, 45.5, 55.3 (O‐CH 3 ), 72.7 ( C H 2 ‐Ar), 75.6 (C‐9), 113.7 (2×C‐3′), 129.0 (2×C‐2′), 130.9 (C‐1′), 159.0 (C‐4′), 205.3 (C‐1). The analytical data correspond to those reported previously 22c…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…=+5.4, c =0.5 in CH 2 Cl 2 ); 1 H NMR (499.873 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ =0.83 (d, 3 J =6.5 Hz, 3 H; CH 3 ), 0.84 (d, 3 J =6.6 Hz, 3 H; CH 3 ), 0.90 (d, 3 J =6.8 Hz, 3 H; CH 3 ), 1.04 (d, 3 J =6.9 Hz, 3 H; 2‐CH‐C H 3 ), 0.90–1.00 (m, 1 H), 1.19–1.33 (m, 4 H), 1.36–1.43 (m, 1 H), 1.50–1.65 (m, 2 H), 1.78–1.85 (m, 1 H), 2.35–2.44 (m, 1 H; 2‐CH), 3.16 (dd, 2 J =8.9, 3 J =6.9 Hz, 1 H; 9‐CH 2 ), 3.29 (dd, 2 J =9.1, 3 J =5.2 Hz, 1 H; 9‐CH 2 ), 3.78 (s, 3 H; O‐CH 3 ), 4.38 (d, 2 J =11.7 Hz, 1 H; C H 2 ‐Ar), 4.42 (d, 2 J =11.7 Hz, 1 H; C H 2 ‐Ar), 6.85 (m, 2 H; 3′‐CH), 7.23 (m, 2 H; 2′‐CH), 9.59 (d, 3 J =1.9 Hz, 1 H; ‐C(O)H); 13 C NMR (125.709 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ =13.1 (CH 3 ), 18.3 (CH 3 ), 20.0 (CH 3 ), 20.7 (CH 3 ), 27.4, 27.5, 30.9, 37.0, 41.7, 44.2, 45.5, 55.3 (O‐CH 3 ), 72.7 ( C H 2 ‐Ar), 75.6 (C‐9), 113.7 (2×C‐3′), 129.0 (2×C‐2′), 130.9 (C‐1′), 159.0 (C‐4′), 205.3 (C‐1). The analytical data correspond to those reported previously 22c…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results render this macrolide an attractive synthetic target for the development of novel antiangiogenetic drugs. Very recently, four elegant total syntheses have been reported22 among which the synthesis of Theodorakis22c became of particular interest to us. Thus, in his synthesis the key building block for the northern hemisphere of borrelidin, aldehyde (+)‐ 27 , which is a tetradeoxypropionate derivative, was prepared employing the iterative enolate alkylation strategy developed by Myers et al3 in 13 steps starting from iodide 29 in 36 % overall yield 22c…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This nucleophilic attack will follow the Bürgi-Dunitz trajectory [63] and result in TS26, which minimizes steric interactions with the R M -group and leads to the Felkin product (Scheme 5.22). Theodorakis and coworkers nicely demonstrated the Felkin induction during their synthesis of (−)-borrelidin (141) involving the late-stage Mukaiyama aldol reaction between the silyl ketene acetal 139a and aldehyde 138, which produced the desired ester 140 in 95% yield with dr = 4 : 1 (Scheme 5.23) [64].…”
Section: 2-asymmetric Induction Using Chiral Aldehydesmentioning
confidence: 99%