2003
DOI: 10.1021/ol034393t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoselective Synthesis of 2-Deoxy-β-Galactosides via 2-Deoxy-2-bromo- and 2-Deoxy-2-iodo-galactopyranosyl Donors

Abstract: [reaction: see text] A series of 2-bromo- and 2-iodo-galactopyranosyl acetates and trichloroacetimidates were evaluated as glycosyl donors for the synthesis of 2-deoxygalactopyranosides. The best selectivity for the beta-glycosidic linkage was achieved by using 6-deoxy-3,4-carbonate-protected galactosyl donors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12] Although mechanisms involving bridged intermediates such as the episulfonium ions 4 and 8 provide concise and satisfying explanations for observations such as those shown in Schemes 1 and 2, accumulating evidence suggests that such intermediates may not be involved in stereoselective substitution processes. The fact that reactions that would be expected to proceed through episulfonium, [6,7,[13][14][15] episelenonium, [13,16] or iodonium ions [9,10] (9, Figure 1) are not completely selective [17] indicates that these reactions may occur by a different pathway or through multiple pathways. The formation of the product that would not correspond to stereospecific opening of the onium ion 9 (i.e., the 1,2-cis product) is typically explained by invoking oxocarbenium ions 10 as reactive intermediates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Although mechanisms involving bridged intermediates such as the episulfonium ions 4 and 8 provide concise and satisfying explanations for observations such as those shown in Schemes 1 and 2, accumulating evidence suggests that such intermediates may not be involved in stereoselective substitution processes. The fact that reactions that would be expected to proceed through episulfonium, [6,7,[13][14][15] episelenonium, [13,16] or iodonium ions [9,10] (9, Figure 1) are not completely selective [17] indicates that these reactions may occur by a different pathway or through multiple pathways. The formation of the product that would not correspond to stereospecific opening of the onium ion 9 (i.e., the 1,2-cis product) is typically explained by invoking oxocarbenium ions 10 as reactive intermediates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] Using directing groups at C-2 that are later removed is inherently inefficient. [6,8] Many direct methods rely on stoichiometric promoters and/or precursors that require several steps to synthesize. [9] Catalyzing the direct addition of an alcohol to a glycal (2) is the most atom-efficient route to 2-deoxyglycosides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, perbenzylated galactal 2 d was used as a model donor and reacted with a range of differentially protected glycosyl acceptors 3 b-3 j under the optimized reaction conditions. Glycosyl acceptors with a primary alcohol [20] and either benzyl or benzoyl protecting groups, as well as either methoxy or thiophenyl as the anomeric substituents gave yields of the isolated product of 87-98 % and a-selectivity (Table 2, entries 1, 2, 8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly selective methods for the synthesis of 2-deoxy-␤-glycosides by using 2-iodo-glycosyl acetate, trichloroacetimidate, and fluoride donors were recently reported from this laboratory (49)(50)(51)(52)(53). These glycosidation reactions afford the ␤-glycosides in high yield and with excellent ␤-selectivity.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Glycosyl Donor 30mentioning
confidence: 99%