1988
DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(88)90330-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoselective protein binding of verapamil enantiomers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodological differences seem an unlikely explanation for the discrepancy between the two studies because predose protein binding was essentially identical. In the current study, however, subjects received a commercially available 240 mg sustained release dose of rac-verapamil, while in the study by Gross et al [2], subjects were given 80 mg d2-(+)-verapamil and 80 mg unlabelled (-)-verapamil simultaneously. In their intravenous administration studies, labelled and unlabelled verapamil enantiomers were administered separately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Methodological differences seem an unlikely explanation for the discrepancy between the two studies because predose protein binding was essentially identical. In the current study, however, subjects received a commercially available 240 mg sustained release dose of rac-verapamil, while in the study by Gross et al [2], subjects were given 80 mg d2-(+)-verapamil and 80 mg unlabelled (-)-verapamil simultaneously. In their intravenous administration studies, labelled and unlabelled verapamil enantiomers were administered separately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Table 1 Average free fractions (mean ± s.d.) of R-and Sverapamil in eight human subjects before, following a single dose, and after multiple doses of 240 mg sustained release racemic oral verapamil Enantiomer Predose Single dose Steady state R-verapamil 0.051 ± 0.012 0.050 ± 0.008 0.051 ± 0.008 S-verapamil 0.097 ± 0.023 0.093 ± 0.017 0.094 ± 0.010 Table 2 Influence of norverapamil, D617, and D620 on the fraction unbound (mean ± s. [2] hypothesized that the two-fold increase in the free fraction of R-and S-verapamil following oral verapamil administration was due to metabolite accumulation. The results of the current study do not support either their findings or their hypothesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This selectivity is in consistent with the previous result that (R)-VER is bound more strongly than (S)-VER in human plasma. 30 The detection limit was 5 nM (S/N=3) for each enan- amount.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%