The chapter goes on to analyse a broader sphere of 'litigation in the context of climate change' 5 , rather than only what is generally defined as 'climate litigation' 6 . This includes litigation that brings forward issues that deal with mitigation and adaptation but do not necessarily expressly deal with 'climate change'. Indeed, a rich jurisprudence has developed where litigation has partially been successful in linking issues of rights, livelihoods, ecology and justice. Tracing this jurisprudence provides a broader understanding of litigation on climate change in the region.Accordingly, this chapter provides a fresh perspective to the current literature on climate litigation in India and Pakistan, through a more focussed analysis of climate litigation in the domestic political and legal context within which such litigation takes place. While legal commentators have identified the region for its climate litigation potential, this is often discussed in a decontextualized manner. 7 Much of the literature is comparative, or solely focuses on the Leghari judgement as a standalone leading case. 8 Drawing upon the broad legacy of the Courts, authors conclude the strong potential for climate litigation. While this may be true, as will be argued, the picture is slightly more complex and nuanced. The politics of climate change, discourse around climate change, the politics of the court, as well as developments in different types of litigation, are also important in explaining the opportunities and challenges for climate litigation in Pakistan and India. Ultimately, through understanding this context we can assess how future litigation can enact and implement substantive change. The lessons drawn in this chapter are also relevant to the growing literature on climate change litigation in the Global South where similar challenges are faced.