2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three kinds of primitives were employed: cube, cylinder (32 vertices), and icosphere (80 faces); curves and surfaces' size are important for objects' comprehension [ 24 ]. Objects' orientations were randomized along the three axes to create various stimuli [ 25 ]. Rotations were controlled so as the faces of cubes and cylinders could not be orthogonal to the camera plane, thus preventing the appearance of artificial 2D shapes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three kinds of primitives were employed: cube, cylinder (32 vertices), and icosphere (80 faces); curves and surfaces' size are important for objects' comprehension [ 24 ]. Objects' orientations were randomized along the three axes to create various stimuli [ 25 ]. Rotations were controlled so as the faces of cubes and cylinders could not be orthogonal to the camera plane, thus preventing the appearance of artificial 2D shapes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of 1,000 randomly shaped, smoothly curved objects was used as the experimental stimuli (Norman, Swindle, Jennings, Mullins, & Beers, 2009); the average size/diameter of the objects was approximately 13.3 cm (which corresponds to 7.6º of visual angle). The objects were optically defined by texture (which resembled red granite), Lambertian shading, and occlusion contours.…”
Section: Experimental Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although binocular disparity has been shown to contribute to the perception of surface properties such as slant, tilt, and curvature (e.g., Ban & Welchman, 2015 ; Norman et al, 1995 ; Norman et al, 2009 ; Welchman et al, 2005 ; Wexler & Ouarti, 2008 ; Wismeijer, Erkelens, van Ee, & Wexler, 2010 ), its role in the recognition of complex 3D object shape remains unclear. Indeed, it has been argued that although stereo information (i.e., local depth disparity) facilitates processing of 3D surfaces properties this does not, in itself, establish a functional link between stereo vision and the perception (and recognition) of complex (i.e., multipart) 3D object shape per se ( Li et al, 2009 ; Pizlo, 2008 ; Pizlo et al, 2010 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%