2006
DOI: 10.1086/510586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoscopic Electron Spectroscopy of Solar Hard X-Ray Flares with a Single Spacecraft

Abstract: Hard X-ray (HXR) spectroscopy is the most direct method of diagnosing energetic electrons in solar flares. Here we present a technique that allows us to use a single HXR spectrum to determine an effectively stereoscopic electron energy distribution. Considering the Sun's surface to act as a "Compton mirror" allows us to look at emitting electrons also from behind the source, providing vital information on downward-propagating particles. Using this technique we determine simultaneously the electron spectra of d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
44
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
44
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our CSC simulations we find that the electrons move more or less equally up and down the loop axis ( v z+ v Z− ) with v ⊥ / v about 0.05 in the chromosphere and 0.20 in the corona. Unlike the strong downward beaming ( v z+ v z− ) in the basic CTTM (Brown 1972), this distribution is broadly consistent with (Kontar & Brown 2006) albedo mirror diagnostic "near isotropy" results from RHESSI spectra. The v ⊥ /v 1 property of electrons in the CSC LRTTM may, however, still yield enough H α impact polarization to contribute to that observed Kašparová et al 2005) though other mechanisms (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our CSC simulations we find that the electrons move more or less equally up and down the loop axis ( v z+ v Z− ) with v ⊥ / v about 0.05 in the chromosphere and 0.20 in the corona. Unlike the strong downward beaming ( v z+ v z− ) in the basic CTTM (Brown 1972), this distribution is broadly consistent with (Kontar & Brown 2006) albedo mirror diagnostic "near isotropy" results from RHESSI spectra. The v ⊥ /v 1 property of electrons in the CSC LRTTM may, however, still yield enough H α impact polarization to contribute to that observed Kašparová et al 2005) though other mechanisms (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Brown et al 1990) have reviewed problematic aspects of the standard CTTM model and aspects of recent data (especially from RHESSI - Lin et al (2002)) certainly require modification of the most basic CTTM involving a single monolithic loop. These include: the motion of HXR footpoints (Fletcher et al 2004); the smallness of the albedo component in HXR spectra (Kontar & Brown 2006;Kašparová et al 2007) compared to that expected from the strong downward beaming in the CTTM (Brown 1972); the relative time evolution of the heated soft X-ray (SXR) plasma emission measure EM(t) and temperature T (t), (e.g. Horan 1971;Stoiser et al 2008a).…”
Section: Basic Cttm Properties and Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be also expressed by a decrease of the directivity of the associated X-ray bremsstrahlung emission. This fact agrees with the statement of Kontar & Brown (2006) that conventional solar flare models with a simple downward beaming should be excluded. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Nevertheless, the paper by Kontar & Brown (2006) allows us to compare our simulations with their derived ratio of downward-to-upward electron distributions, F d (E)/F u (E). The comparison reveals an agreement between inferred F d (E)/F u (E) and Model F within the confidence interval up to ∼50 keV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an electron beam undergoing solely collisional energy loss, as in the standard thick target model, gives up around 10 5 times energy to heat than to bremsstrahlung and demands (Brown 1971) a very high electron production rate to yield observed hard X-ray fluxes. Furthermore the electron beam and hard X-ray source anisotropies in the standard thick target model (Brown 1972) are much higher than inferred from the flare hard X-ray data (Kontar & Brown 2006). Brown et al (2009) have proposed that if fast electrons, on reaching the chromosphere, undergo re-acceleration by current sheets there, their enhanced lifetimes increase the hard X-ray yield per electron, so reducing the injection rate needed for hard X-ray production, while greatly reducing the fast electron anisotropy in the main hard X-ray source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%