2017
DOI: 10.1111/joa.12747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereological assessment of the blood‐air barrier and the surfactant system after mesenchymal stem cell pretreatment in a porcine non‐heart‐beating donor model for lung transplantation

Abstract: More frequent utilization of non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) organs for lung transplantation has the potential to relieve the shortage of donor organs. In particular with respect to uncontrolled NHBD, concerns exist regarding the risk of ischaemia/reperfusion (IR) injury-related graft damage or dysfunction. Due to their immunomodulating and tissue-remodelling properties, bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been suspected of playing a beneficial role regarding short- and long-term survival and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantification of its components provided the basis for assessing bab thickness, diffusion capacity and septal oedema formation [ 20 , 44 ]. Total thickness of porcine bab in our study equalled thickness in weaner pigs (28–32 kg body weight) (1.06 μm) [ 45 ], but was slightly thinner than in newborn (1.65 μm) and 30 d old piglets (1.55 μm) [ 46 ]. Human bab was thicker (2.2 μm) [ 44 ], but the bab of small rodents much thinner (0.36 μm) [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Quantification of its components provided the basis for assessing bab thickness, diffusion capacity and septal oedema formation [ 20 , 44 ]. Total thickness of porcine bab in our study equalled thickness in weaner pigs (28–32 kg body weight) (1.06 μm) [ 45 ], but was slightly thinner than in newborn (1.65 μm) and 30 d old piglets (1.55 μm) [ 46 ]. Human bab was thicker (2.2 μm) [ 44 ], but the bab of small rodents much thinner (0.36 μm) [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%