2013
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.401588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereochemical Determinants of C-terminal Specificity in PDZ Peptide-binding Domains

Abstract: Background: PDZ-peptide binding specificities establish a complex network of protein-protein interactions in the cell. Results: Crystal structures of multiple PDZ-peptide complexes reveal distinct mechanisms for accommodating C-terminal ligand side chains. Conclusion: A residue in the PDZ "X⌽ 1 G⌽ 2 " signature sequence co-determines peptide carboxylate and C-terminal side-chain binding. Significance: Understanding the stereochemical determinants of peptide binding leads to an improved ability to predict PDZ i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
101
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(87 reference statements)
9
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation is that the C-terminal carboxylate of the ligand positions differently towards the carboxylate-binding site of the PDZ domains and thereby attains subtle differences in H-bond patterns, which also has been suggested by X-ray crystal structures of PDZ domains in complex with C-terminal ligands 50 . These findings together with our present data suggest that the C-terminal interaction at the carboxylatebinding site could be part of a selectivity mechanism that allows the PDZ domains to discriminate between C-terminal peptide ligands 51 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…One possible explanation is that the C-terminal carboxylate of the ligand positions differently towards the carboxylate-binding site of the PDZ domains and thereby attains subtle differences in H-bond patterns, which also has been suggested by X-ray crystal structures of PDZ domains in complex with C-terminal ligands 50 . These findings together with our present data suggest that the C-terminal interaction at the carboxylatebinding site could be part of a selectivity mechanism that allows the PDZ domains to discriminate between C-terminal peptide ligands 51 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…CALP displayed strong preferences for I/L/V and S/T at position 0 (P 0 ) and position −2 (P −2 ), respectively, where P 0 is defined as the most C-terminal residue. These preferences are in excellent agreement with the assignment of CALP as a bona fide class I PDZ domain 31 , and with our previous studies 27,30,32 . At positions P −6 through P −9 , the wt amino acids can be replaced by any other, which is typical of the relatively non-specific interactions of N-terminal residues with the PDZ domain 14 .…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Given the lack of upstream binding motifs, we decided to explore the free-energy contributions of non-motif residues, using nested sets of chimeric peptides based on reference sequences with both high (iCAL36; K i = 23 μM) and low (CFTR; K i = 420 μM) affinity for the CALP domain (Amacher et al, 2013). Using fluorescence polarization (FP) competition experiments, we determined K i values for each of the chimeric peptides binding to CALP (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%