Abstract:OBJECTIVE
Coupled with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG), radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) has emerged as a therapeutic alternative for patients with refractory focal epilepsy, with proven safe but highly variable results across studies. The authors aimed to describe the outcomes and safety of SEEG-RFTC, focusing on patients with MRI-negative epilepsy.
METHODS
A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients evaluated by SEEG in the authors’ center. Of 84 total cases, 55 underwent RFTC… Show more
ObjectiveRadiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment method for patients with refractory focal epilepsy, when stereo‐electroencephalography (SEEG) is implanted. Although real‐world research results are still limited, a considerable number of patients have shown favorable outcomes with this less invasive method. This study aims to describe the outcomes and predictive factors of SEEG‐RFTC in real‐world research.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on patients in the authors' epilepsy center. In total, 121 patients who underwent RFTC were included in the study. Post‐RFTC outcomes were evaluated using the seizure‐free rate and response rate (seizure frequency reduction more than 50%). Predictive factors influencing post‐RFTC outcome were considered by comparing different variables.ResultsThe mean follow‐up period was 18.3 months. Eighty‐two patients (67.8%) were responders and 54 (44.6%) were seizure free. In 36 patients with malformation of cortical development, the seizure‐free rate and the response rate were 69.44% and 83.33%, respectively. In 20 patients with hippocampal sclerosis, 19 patients were responders and 14 (70%) patients were seizure free at the last follow‐up. The MRI feature and etiology of epilepsy are correlated with the outcome. MR‐positive is a predictive factor for seizure freedom (p < 0.01) and responders (p < 0.01). Other factors have no predictive value for post‐RFTC outcome.InterpretationSEEG‐RFTC is a safe procedure and yields favorable outcomes in numerous cases of focal DRE. The MRI feature and etiology of epilepsy are correlated with the seizure‐free rate and response rate. And MRI positivity is the predictor for good RFTC outcome.
ObjectiveRadiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment method for patients with refractory focal epilepsy, when stereo‐electroencephalography (SEEG) is implanted. Although real‐world research results are still limited, a considerable number of patients have shown favorable outcomes with this less invasive method. This study aims to describe the outcomes and predictive factors of SEEG‐RFTC in real‐world research.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on patients in the authors' epilepsy center. In total, 121 patients who underwent RFTC were included in the study. Post‐RFTC outcomes were evaluated using the seizure‐free rate and response rate (seizure frequency reduction more than 50%). Predictive factors influencing post‐RFTC outcome were considered by comparing different variables.ResultsThe mean follow‐up period was 18.3 months. Eighty‐two patients (67.8%) were responders and 54 (44.6%) were seizure free. In 36 patients with malformation of cortical development, the seizure‐free rate and the response rate were 69.44% and 83.33%, respectively. In 20 patients with hippocampal sclerosis, 19 patients were responders and 14 (70%) patients were seizure free at the last follow‐up. The MRI feature and etiology of epilepsy are correlated with the outcome. MR‐positive is a predictive factor for seizure freedom (p < 0.01) and responders (p < 0.01). Other factors have no predictive value for post‐RFTC outcome.InterpretationSEEG‐RFTC is a safe procedure and yields favorable outcomes in numerous cases of focal DRE. The MRI feature and etiology of epilepsy are correlated with the seizure‐free rate and response rate. And MRI positivity is the predictor for good RFTC outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.